You are here:

Presenting Correlated Concepts by Augmented-Reality Instructional Animations
PROCEEDING

, Department of Graphic Arts and Communications, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan ; , Department of Visual Communication Design, Taipei University of Marine Technology, Taiwan

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-31-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract concept is often difficult to present by traditional lectures In recent years, Augmented-Reality (AR) techniques have made possible of dubbing explanatory information onto abstract phenomena and have been evidenced to be effective in facilitating abstract concept learning This study intended to expand the scope of previous instructional AR research to explore how split-attention effect and redundancy effect would affect the cognitive load and learning achievement while dual concepts are coordinately demonstrated by AR Phases of the moon and tidal effects were selected as the dual correlated concepts to be taught A four-frame display of coordinated animations that presents these two correlated phenomena employing AR techniques was developed Learner’s cognitive loads were compared with the interactions of spatial ability to examine the split-attention effect and redundancy effect The results indicated that single-display of coordinate, successively variated phenomena could result in better learning achievement, due to the reason that single-display mode produces less cognitive load It is evident that multi-display of coordinate phenomena could cause intensified redundancy effect that overcasts split-attention effect on cognitive load There is also an additional finding that high spatial ability group outperformed the medium and low groups in terms of learning achievement Further investigations with larger sample sizes are suggested

Citation

Wang, C.H. & Chen, Y.H. (2017). Presenting Correlated Concepts by Augmented-Reality Instructional Animations. In J. Dron & S. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 693-702). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 14, 2024 from .

© 2017 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Balog, A., Pribeanu, C., & Iordache, D. (2007). Augmented reality in schools: Preliminary evaluation results from a summer school. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 163-166.
  2. Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented reality in education. New horizons for learning.
  3. Bujak, K.R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., Macintyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers& Education, 68, 536-544.
  4. Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the Impact of Formative Feedback on Student Learning through an Online Feedback System. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 111-122.
  5. Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers& Education, 52(1), 78-82.
  6. Juan, C., Beatrice, F., & Cano, J. (2008, July). An augmented reality system for learning the interior of the human body. In Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT '08. (pp. 186-188). IEEE.
  7. Karime, A., Hossain, M.A., Rahman, A.M., Gueaieb, W., Alja’am, J.M., & El Saddik, A. (2012). RFID-based interactive multimedia system for the children. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 59(3), 749-774.
  8. Kimer, C., Zorzal, E.R., & Kirner, T.G. (2006, October). Case studies on the development of games using augmented reality. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2006. SMC'06. IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1636-1641). IEEE.
  9. Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning.
  10. Lee, S.H., Choi, J., & Park, J.I. (2009). Interactive e-learning system using pattern recognition and augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 55(2), 883-890.
  11. Lord, T.R. (1985). Enhancing the visuospatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 395-405.
  12. Matsutomo, S., Miyauchi, T., Noguchi, S., & Yamashita, H. (2012). Real-time visualization system of magnetic field utilizing augmented reality technology for education. IEEE transactions on magnetics, 48(2), 531-534.
  13. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
  14. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridg, England: Cambridge University Press
  15. Mayer, R.E., & Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of educational psychology, 86(3), 389.
  16. Mayer, R.E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256.
  17. McGee, M.G. (1978). Effect of two problem solving strategies on mental rotation test scores. The Journal of Psychology, 100(1), 83-85.
  18. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
  19. Pellegrino, J.W., & Kail, R. (1982). Process analyses of spatial aptitude. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 1, 311-365
  20. Schoor, C., Bannert, M., & Brünken, R. (2012). Role of dual task design when measuring cognitive load during multimedia learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 753-768.
  21. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K.E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. ACM Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.
  22. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
  23. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J.J., & Paas, F.G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296.
  24. Thurstone, L.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, America: University press
  25. Wang, C.-H., & Chi, P.-H. (2012). Applying augmented reality in teaching fundamental earth science in junior high schools. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 352, 23-30.
  26. Yoon, S.A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledgebuilding scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519-541.
  27. Yuen, S.C.Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 4(1), 11.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections