You are here:

Video Supported Flipped Classroom
PROCEEDING

, University of Houston, United States ; , Purdue University, United States ; , , University of Houston, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Washington, DC ISBN 978-1-939797-29-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

This paper addresses the use of video for a flipped classroom with a case study. The instructor makes the lecture videos available to the students prior to class, and utilizes the class time for discussion and student questions. We evaluate this approach with an introductory psychology course that was taught repeatedly in a traditional way and as a lecture video supported flipped classroom. The evaluation is based on assessing i) student perception of this instruction model, ii) teaching and course evaluations, iii) instructor satisfaction, vi) student performance, and v) video usage analytics. An overwhelming majority of students stated that they prefer this combination of video and class discussions to a traditional class. The instructor expressed a higher level of satisfaction for this style of a flipped classroom over a traditional classroom. However, confounding variables in the structuring of the course prevent us from making firm conclusions about student performance.

Citation

Tuna, T., Dey, T., Subhlok, J. & Leasure, L. (2017). Video Supported Flipped Classroom. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 1159-1171). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2017 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aronson, N., Arfstrom, K.M., & Tam, K. (2013). Flipped learning in higher education. Retrieved from: http://flippedlearning.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/HigherEdWhitePAper-FINAL.pdf
  2. Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class everyday. International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Butt A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education& Accreditation, vol. 6, no. 1, P. 33.
  4. Crouch, C.H. & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 970–977.
  5. Deshpande, R., Tuna, T., Subhlok, J. & Barker L. (2014). A crowdsourcing caption editor for educational videos. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, p 1-8
  6. Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning& Leading with Technology, vol. 39, no. 8, P. 1217.
  7. Grabe, M. (2005). Voluntary use of online lecture notes: correlates of note use and note use as an alternative to class attendance. Comput. Educ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 409–421.
  8. Grabe, M. & Christopherson, K. (2005). Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of providing lecture notes: The role of internet technology as a delivery system and research tool. Internet High. Educ., vol. 8, no. 4, P. 291-298.
  9. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. & Arfstrom, K. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Flipped learning network.-1170-EdMedia 2017-Washington, DC, United States, June 20-23, 2017
  10. Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J. & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J. Econ. Educ., vol. 31, no 1, P. 30-43.
  11. Lord, S.M. & Camacho, M.M. (2007). Effective teaching practices: Preliminary analysis of engineering educators. In Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports. FIE’07. 37th Annual. IEEE, pp. F3C–7.
  12. Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N. & Swift A.W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 317–
  13. O’Flaherty, J. & Phillips C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 25, pp. 85–95.
  14. Overmyer, G.R. (2007). The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University Libraries)
  15. Pierce, R. And Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a flipped classroom model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American journal of pharmaceutical education, vol. 76, no. 10.
  16. Ryan, M.D. & Reid, S.A. (2015). Impact of the flipped classroom on student performance and retention: A parallel controlled study in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, vol 93 (1), 13-23.
  17. Shumski, D. (2014). 6 colleges that flipped stem classrooms. Education Dive: http://www.educationdive.com/news/6colleges-that-flipped-stemclassrooms/229602/.
  18. Stone, B.B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. In Proceedings from 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching& Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  19. Strayer, J.F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 171–193.
  20. Tucker B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, vol. 12, no. 1.
  21. Tuna, T., Joshi, M., Varghese, V., Deshpande, R., Subhlok, J. & Verma R. (2015). Topic based segmentation of classroom videos. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference(FIE), El Paso, Texas.
  22. Tuna, T., Subhlok, J., Barker, L., Varghese, V., Johnson, O., & Shah, S. (2012). Development and evaluation of indexed captioned searchable videos for stem coursework. Proceedings of the 43rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM, pp. 129–134.
  23. Tuna, T., Subhlok, J. & Shah, S. (2011). Indexing and keyword search to ease navigation in lecture videos. Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8.
  24. Tuna, T., Subhlok, J., Barker, L., Shah, S., Johnson, O. & Hovey, C. (2017). Indexed captioned searchable videos: A learning companion for STEM coursework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.26, 1, 82–99.
  25. Tune, J.D., Sturek, M. & Basile, D.P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in physiology education, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 316–320.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections