You are here:

Bringing New Literacies into the Content Area Literacy Methods Course
Article

, University of Louisville, United States

CITE Journal Volume 7, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Multiple states set coursework in content area literacy as a requirement for secondary teacher licensure (Romine, McKenna, & Robinson, 1996; Sheridan-Thomas, 2007). This paper discusses my Content Area Reading and Writing course designed for secondary preservice teachers who are in a range of disciplines: secondary English, science, mathematics, foreign language, social studies, art, music, and physical education.

Citation

Kajder, S.B. (2007). Bringing New Literacies into the Content Area Literacy Methods Course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 92-99. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved August 11, 2024 from .

© 2007 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alvermann, D. (2006). Youth in the middle: Our guides to improved literacy instruction. Voices from the Middle, 14(2), 7-13.
  2. Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Seixas, P. Stearns & S. Wineberg (Eds.), Teaching, learning and knowing history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331-353). New York: New York University
  3. Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: Academic blogging as new literacy. In M. Knobel& C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler. New York: Peter Lang.
  4. Enciso, P., Katz, L, Kiefer, B., Price-Dennis, D. & Wilson, D. (2006). Words, signs and social relations. Language Arts, 84(1), 8-9.
  5. Gee, J.P. (2004). What videogames have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillian.
  6. Holland, D., Lachinotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  7. Hull, G., & Nelson, M.E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224-261.
  8. Kajder, S. (2003). Plugging in: What technology brings to the English/language arts classroom. Voices from the Middle, 11(3), 6-9.
  9. Kajder, S. (2006). Bringing the outside in: Visual ways to engage struggling readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
  10. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  11. Lasley, T.J. (1980). Preservice teacher beliefs about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(4), 38-41.
  12. Luke, A. (2001). Foreward. In E.B. Moje & D.G.O’Brien (Eds.), Constructions of
  13. McKenna, M., & Robinson, R. (2006). Teaching through text: Reading and writing in the content areas (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.
  14. Moje, E.B. (1996). “I teach students, not subjects”: Teacher-student relationships as contexts for secondary literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 172-195.
  15. Moje, E.B., & Sutherland, L. (2003). The future of middle school literacy education. English Education, 32(2), 149-164.
  16. Rafferty, C. (1990, October). Literacy in the information age. Education Leadership, 57(2), 22-25.
  17. Sturtevant, E., Boyd, F., Brozo, W., Hinchman, K., Moore, D., & Alvermann, D. (2007). Principled practices for adolescent literacy: A framework for instruction and policy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Author Note: Sara B. Kajder

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections