References

1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Community, diversity, and conflict among schoolteachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
2. Chazan, D.C. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
3. Chen, J., Zaïane, O.R., & Goebel, R. (2009, June). Detecting communities in large networks by iterative local expansion. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computational Social Networks, Fountainbleau, France. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3)
4. Clark, P.G., Moore, K.C., & Carlson, M.P. (2008). Documenting the emergence of "speaking with meaning" as a sociomathematical norm in professional learning community discourse. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(4), 297-310.
   DOI> 10.1016/J.jmathb.2009.01.001
5. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-164.
6. Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Dean, C. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers' learning: A reflection from the field. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165-199.
7. Dean, C.O. (2005). An analysis of the emergence and concurrent learning of a professional teaching community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
8. Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of teachers' professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
9. Franke, M.L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B.S. Nelson& J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy in elementary mathematics: The nature of facilitative teaching (pp. 47-74). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C., Quiroz, P., Secada, W., Williams, T., & Ashman, S.(2003).Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
12. Grossman, P.L., Wineburg, S.S., & Woolworth, S. (2000, April). In pursuit of teacher community. Paper presented at the at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
13. Grossman, P.L., Wineburg, S.S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
14. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M.L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203225.
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitamate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998, April). Developing a community of practice for reform of mathematics and science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, SanDiego, CA. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3)
17. Little, J.W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917-946.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to action. Reston, VA: Author.
19. Nelson, B.C., & Hammerman, J.K. (1996). Reconceptualizing teaching: Moving toward the creation of intellectual communities of students, teachers, and teacher educators. In M.W. McLaughlin& I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 3-21). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20. Newmann, F.M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. Nickerson, S.D., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teacher' professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 113-140.
22. Penuel, W.R., & Riel, M. (2007). The 'new' science of networks and the challenge of school change. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(8), 611-615.
23. Penuel, W.R., Sussex, W., Korbak, C., & Hoadley, C. (2006). Investigating the potential of using social network analysis in educational evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(4), 437-451.
    DOI> 10.1177/1098214006294307
24. Rasmussen, C.L., & Stephan, M. (2008). A methodology for documenting collective activity. In A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh & J.Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook for innovative design research in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education (pp. 195-215). New York, NY: Taylor& Francis.
25. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209-229.
26. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J.V. Wertsch & A. Alvarez (Eds.),Sociocultural studies of the mind (pp. 139-164). New York, NY: Cambridge
27. Secada, W.G., & Adajian, L.B. (1997). Mathematics teachers' change in the context of their professional teaching communities. In E. Fennema & B.S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 193-219). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
28. Smith, G., & Ferguson, D. (2002). Teaching over the Web versus in the classroom: Differences in instructor experience. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 61-67.
29. Stein, M.K., & Brown, C.A. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-192). Mahwah, NJ:
30. Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb& H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163-201). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
32. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students, and science linguistic minority classrooms. In W. Secada, E.
33. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. Westheimer, J. (1998). Among school teachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in teachers' work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36. Wilson, S.M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A.
37. Wojnar, L. (2002). Research summary of a best practice model of online teaching and learning. English Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 2-9.