Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion: A Work in progress Report
Purchase or Subscription required for access
Purchase individual articles and papers
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).
Already have access?
Individual Subscription
If you have an individual subscription, sign in here for access
Institutional Subscription
You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 3.135.188.194).
If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.
You can search for your instition by name or by location.
Authors
![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/ELEARN.png)
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2003 in Phoenix, Arizona, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-50-1
Abstract
This paper describes and discusses the Project ROAD - Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion. The paper in particular discusses the mediating importance of rules to be well established for online discussions with the complementary emphasis of personal and collective representations for online discussions. In addition, the paper discusses the current work in progress with reference to the proposal for a multi-tier way of encouraging response to an invitation, better termed as "legitimacy to response". In essence, the paper is only an attempt to share the ideas of the project to the community of educators and researchers.
Citation
Chen, D.T.V. & Hung, D. (2003). Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion: A Work in progress Report. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2003--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2212-2215). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 15, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/12318.
© 2003 AACE