You are here:

Learning in educational computer games for novices: The impact of support provision types on virtual presence, cognitive load, and learning outcomes
ARTICLE

,

IRRODL Volume 13, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

Embedding support devices in educational computer games has been asserted to positively affect learning outcomes. However, there is only limited direct empirical evidence on which design variations of support provision influence learning. In order to better understand the impact of support design on novices’ learning, the current study investigates how support devices and their type of provision (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) determine games’ effectiveness on learning outcomes. This effectiveness is also related to how the design-type of provision influences learners’ virtual presence and cognitive load. Compared to an educational adventure game without additional support, the results indicate that the game equipped with support devices enhances learning outcomes, although no differences in cognitive load were found. A variation in the design of provision shows no effect. In order to gain a more thorough understanding of support devices and their design for games, additional learner characteristics (e.g., interest) should be considered in future research.

Citation

Schrader, C. & Bastiaens, T. (2012). Learning in educational computer games for novices: The impact of support provision types on virtual presence, cognitive load, and learning outcomes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 206-227. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ainley, M., Corrigan, M., & Richardson, N. (2005). Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students’ reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction, 15, 433-447.
  2. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277-320.
  3. Alphabit (2010). Winterfest-Das Lernadventure [Computer Game]. Retrieved 30.11.2011, from http://www.lernspiel-winterfest.de/
  4. Barrows, H.S., & Tamblyn, R.M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  5. Beale, I.L., Kato, P.M., Marin-Bowling, V.M., Guthrie, N., & Cole, S.W. (2007). Improvement in cancer-related knowledge following use of a psychoeducational videogame for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(3), 263-270.
  6. Bruner, J.S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
  7. Capt’n Sharky (2010). Coppenrath Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Münster.
  8. Chall, J.S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge. New York: Guilford.
  9. Cobb, S., & Fraser, D.S. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 525-547). Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Dede, C., Clarke, J., Ketelhut, D.J., Nelson, B., & Bowman, C. (2005, April). Students’ motivation and learning of science in a multi-user virtual environment. Paper
  11. Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R.B., & Ash, K. (1997). Using virtual reality technology to convey abstract scientific concepts. In M.J. Jacobson& R.B. Kozma (Eds.), Learning the sciences of the 21st century: Research, design, and implementing advanced technology learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  12. De Jong, T. (2005). The guided-discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 215-228). Cambridge,
  13. Dweck, C.S. (2002). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students‘ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. European Commission’s IST-Programme (2009). ELEKTRA [Computer Game]. Retrieved 09.11.2011, from http://www.elektra-project.org/
  14. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
  15. Hasselhorn, M., & Mähler, C. (2001). Transfer. In D. Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch pädagogische psychologie (pp. 721-730). Weinheim: PVU.
  16. Heers, R. (2005). Being there. Untersuchungen zum wissenserwerb in virtuellen umgebungen. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen. Retrieved from http://deposit.d-nb.de/cg I-b in/dokserv? idn=974321664&dok_var=d1&dok_
  17. Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism vs. Constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
  18. Kalyuga, S., & Paas, F. (2005, August). Cognitive measurement to design effective learning environments. Paper presented at JURE workshop, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  19. Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. (2009). Evaluating and managing cognitive load in games. In R.E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 719-737). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  20. Kerres, M., Bormann, M., & Vervenne, M. (2009). Didaktische konzeption von serious games: Zur verknüpfung von spiel-und lernangeboten. MedienPädagogik. Zeitschrift für theorie und praxis der medienbildung.
  21. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problembased, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 46, 7586.
  22. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661-667.
  23. Klauer, K.J. (1985). Framework for a theory of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 5-17.
  24. Kolb, D.A. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  25. Krapp, A., & Weidenmann, B. (2001). Pädagogische psychologie (4th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
  26. Leemkuil, H. (2006). Is it all in the game? Learner support in an educational knoweldge management simulation game (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  27. Lepper, M.R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning “play” into “work” and “work” into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257-307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  28. Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 113-132.
  29. Lim, C.P., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in Science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211–231.
  30. Martens, R.L., Valcke, M.M., & Portier, S.J. (1997). Interactive learning environments to support independent learning: The impact of discernability of embedded support devices. Computers& Education, 28, 185-197.
  31. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 477-500.
  33. Meyer, D.K., & Turner, J.C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 107-114.
  34. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback on discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113.
  35. Nelson, B.C. (2007). Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 83-97.
  36. Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35, 737-743.
  37. Parchman, S.W., Ellis, J.A., Christinaz, D., & Vogel, M. (2000). An evaluation of three computer-based instructional strategies in basic electricity and electronics training. Military Psychology, 12(1), 73-87.
  38. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ selfregulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitive and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-106.
  39. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529-556.
  40. Rieber, L.P., Tzeng, S., & Tribble, K. (2004). Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: Finding the right mix. Learning and Instruction, 14, 307-323.
  41. Salzman, M.C., Dede, C., Loftin, R.B., & Chen, J. (1999). A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(3), 293-316.
  42. Schrader, C. (2010). Computerbasierte lernspiele-Stand der forschung. In S. Ganguin & B. Hoffmann (Eds.), Digitale spielkultur. München: Schriftenreihe zur Medienpäda-gogik.
  43. Schrader, C., & Bastiaens, T.J. (2012). The influence of virtual presence: Effects on experienced cognitive load and learning outcomes in educational computer games. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 648-658.
  44. Standen, P.J., Brown, D.J., & Cromby, J.J. (2001). The effective use of virtual environments in the education and rehabilitation of students with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 289-299.
  45. Tuovinen, J.E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334-341.
  46. Welch, R.B., Blackmon, T.T., Liu, A., Mellers, B.A., & Stark, L.W. (1996). The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 263-273.
  47. Whitton, N. (2010). Learning with digital games: A practical guide to engage students in higher education. New York: Routledge.
  48. Witmer, B.G., & Singer, M.J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240.
  49. Wong, W.L., Shen, C., Nocera, L., Carriazo, E., Tang, F., Bugga, S., & Narayanan, H. (2007). Serious videogame effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 49-55). Salzburg, Austria.
  50. Wood, D. (2001). Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 153-169.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections