You are here:

Student Learning Through Collaborative Decision Making: Analysis of the Effect of Temporal Patterns on Output
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States ; , California State University, Fresno, United States ; , , University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-48-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

This paper describes the methods used for analysis of work style patterns developed by six teams of students working in a simulated distributed decision-making environment over a period of twenty consecutive class meetings. The study required consideration of resource allocation use, effectiveness of team situation assessment, analysis of how the temporal patterns of team work styles developed over time, and assessment of how emergence of different time-use patterns affected team process and product.

Citation

Vick, R., Auernheimer, B., Crosby, M. & Iding, M. (2003). Student Learning Through Collaborative Decision Making: Analysis of the Effect of Temporal Patterns on Output. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2620-2624). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Chudoba, K.M. (1999). Appropriations and patterns in the use of group support systems. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 30(3, 4), 131-148.
  4. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process (2nd ed.). Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.
  5. Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development.
  6. Gersick, C.J.G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
  7. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Jonassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215-240).
  9. McGrath, J.E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher & R.E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
  10. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. NY: Basic Books.
  11. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction (Vol. 35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley.
  13. Schank, R.C., Berman, T.R., & Macpherson, K.A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161-182).
  14. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Wilson, T.P. (1991). Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 2243). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References