You are here:

The Effects of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Hypermedia Based Educational Environments
PROCEEDING

, , University of North Texas, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Major theories regarding learning strategies are widely acknowledged and are derived from established research. Many principles which are central to effective learning from basic multimedia resources have been established and are accepted practices within learning technologies. Results from past studies generally demonstrate support for principles contained within multimedia learning theory; however, there is a need to extend the established working models and theories and apply them to educational practices in non-linear digital hypermedia domains. In recent years, attention on developing and researching e-learning environments focused on individualized learning has increased. This paper will focus on established cognitive learning models relating to self-regulated learning and their influence in developing e-learning hypermedia environments.

Citation

Keahey, H. & Wright, R. (2016). The Effects of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Hypermedia Based Educational Environments. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2120-2124). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ayres, P. (2015). State-of-the-art research into multimedia learning: A commentary on Mayer's handbook of multimedia learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 631-636.
  2. Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (2013). Metacognition and learning technologies: An overview of current interdisciplinary research. In International handbook of metacognition and learning techonologies (pp. 1-16). New
  3. Carr, A., Luckin, R., Yuill, N. & Avramides, L. (2013). How mastery and performance goals influence learners' metacognitive help-seeking behavourals when using Ecolab II. In R. Azevedo, & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 659-668). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
  4. Duffy, M.C., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338348.
  5. Graf, S., Liu, T.C., & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of learners' navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116-131. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2009.00336.x
  6. Greene, J.A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners' self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203-209.
  7. Kraus, L.A., Reed, W.M., & Fitzgerald, G.E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knolwedge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environemnt. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 125-140. Doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00030-3
  8. Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
  9. Mayer, R.E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
  10. Moos, D.C. (2014). Setting the stage for the metacognition during hypermedia learning: What motivation consturcts matter? Computers& Education, 70, 128-137. Doi:doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2013.08.014
  11. Moos, D.C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270-298.
  12. Özyurt, O., Özyurt, H., Güven, B., & Baki, A. (2014). The effects of UZWEBMA on the probability unit achievement of Turkish eleventh grade students and the reasons for such effects. Computers& Education, 75, 1-18.
  13. Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a web-based educational system: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 243-257.
  14. Schieter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2009). The impact of learner characteristics on information utilizaton strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performatnce in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 387-401. Doi:10.1016/J.learninstruc.2009.02.004
  15. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B. (2013). Self-regulation and learning. In W.M. Reynolds, G.E. Miller, & I. Weinter (Eds.), Educational psychology: Vol7, Handbook of phychology (Vol. 7, pp. 45-68). Hoboken, NJ: John
  16. Winne, P.H., & Nesbit, J.C. (2009). 14 Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Grasser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in educatoin. Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum.
  17. Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (2000). Studying as self-regulated learning. In P.P.M. Boekaerts, Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  18. Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological develoments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read