Close Educational Gap by Cheating? Comparing Faculty, Majority and Minority Students' Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty

Purchase or Subscription required for access

Purchase individual articles and papers

PayPal Logo

Receive full-text access to individual articles for $9.95 USD each.

Use PayPal button to purchase PDF copy of paper (4 pages)

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).

Already have access?

Individual Subscription

If you have an individual subscription, sign in here for access

Institutional Subscription

You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 3.144.242.195).

If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.

You can search for your instition by name or by location.

Login via Institution

Authors

Ina Blau, Yoram Eshet-Alkalai, Adi Friedman, The Open University of Israel, Israel

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, Jun 20, 2017 in Washington, DC ISBN 978-1-939797-29-2

Abstract

Studies indicate that in the last years, academic dishonesty (AD), especially digital AD, has become more prevalent in academia. This paper examines the role of technology in shaping the perceived severity of AD (cheating, plagiarism, fabrication, and facilitation; Pavela, 1997), as well as differences in these perceptions between faculty, ethnic majority and minority students in a large University. Findings revealed that analogical and digital offenses were perceived to be equally severe. However, a large interaction was found between the type of offense and the medium, indicating that cheating and facilitation are perceived as more severe in an analogical (versus digital) setting, whereas fabrication is considered more severe in a digital (versus analogical) setting. Faculty and ethnic minority students tended to rate AD as more severe than majority students. The finding is explained in terms of equal educational opportunity and Behavioral Ethics Model (Mazar, Amir, & Ariely, 2008).

Citation

Blau, I., Eshet-Alkalai, Y. & Friedman, A. (2017). Close Educational Gap by Cheating? Comparing Faculty, Majority and Minority Students' Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 118-122). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 9, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/178310.