A Comparative Study of Computer Conferencing and Face-to-Face Communications in Systems Design
Purchase or Subscription required for access
Purchase individual articles and papers
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).
Already have access?
Individual Subscription
If you have an individual subscription, sign in here for access
Institutional Subscription
You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 3.147.28.23).
If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.
You can search for your instition by name or by location.
Authors
![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/sources/JILR.jpg)
JILR Volume 13, Number 3, 2002 ISSN 1093-023X
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of computer conferencing and face-to-face communications to support the work of student teams in a systems analysis project. The study compares the differences in decision quality associated with the projects accomplished by these teams, each team's confidence in the group decision, and each team's satisfaction with the overall decision process. The research questions were: (a) will the computer conferencing groups produce solutions of higher decision quality, as measured by group scores for decision quality, analytical strength, technical strength, research base for drawing conclusions, and the effectiveness of the group presentation; and (b) will the face-to-face groups feel greater confidence in the group decision and greater satisfaction with the group decision process, because of the personal relationships that have been developed, as measured by confidence in the group decision, satisfaction with the group decision process, and peer evaluations of participation of their teammates and effectiveness of their teammates? Based upon the findings, computer conferencing afforded opportunities for handling evaluative tasks more effectively than face-to-face meetings. Computer conferencing offers the benefits of producing better decisions because of broader participation, expression of a wider range of opinions, and greater analysis. Computer conferencing can lower time pressures and create the psychological distance among participants needed to engage in more open, candid exchanges of opinions. Its shortcomings are the time it takes to exchange messages, the increased difficulty of coordinating and clarifying ideas, and the increased time it takes to develop a consensus and to arrive at a decision.
Citation
Sumner, M. & Hostetler, D. (2002). A Comparative Study of Computer Conferencing and Face-to-Face Communications in Systems Design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 277-291. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 11, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/15147.
© 2002 AACE