Mental Effort and Performance as Determinants for the Dynamic Selection of Learning Tasks in Air Traffic Control Training
ARTICLE
Ron J.C.M. Salden, Fred Paas, Nick J. Broers, Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer
ISAIJLS Volume 32, Number 1, ISSN 0020-4277
Abstract
The differential effects of four task selection methods on training efficiency and transfer in computer-based training for Air Traffic Control were investigated. A non-dynamic condition, in which the learning tasks were presented to the participants in a fixed, predetermined sequence, was compared to three dynamic conditions, in which learning tasks were selected on the basis of performance, mental effort, and a combination of both (i.e., mental efficiency). Using the 3-factor mental efficiency formula of Tuovinen and Paas (2004, this issue), the hypothesis that dynamic task selection leads to more efficient training than non-dynamic task selection was confirmed. However, the hypothesis that dynamic task selection based on mental efficiency leads to more efficient training than dynamic task selection based on performance or mental effort alone was not supported. The results are discussed in light of the theoretical framework and suggestions are given for future research.
Citation
Salden, R.J.C.M., Paas, F., Broers, N.J. & van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2004). Mental Effort and Performance as Determinants for the Dynamic Selection of Learning Tasks in Air Traffic Control Training. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(1), 153-172. Retrieved August 12, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/98647/.
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
Cited By
View References & Citations Map-
Are Pretty Interfaces Worth the Time? The Effects of User Interface Types on Web-Based Instruction
Jongpil Cheon, Texas Tech University, United States; Michael M. Grant, The University of Memphis, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 20, No. 1 (January 2009) pp. 5–33
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.