Towards Guidelines for the Design of Interactive Multimedia Instruction: Fostering the Reflective Decision-Making of Preservice Teachers
Article
Richard F. Kenny, Bernard W. Andrews, Marie-Josée Vignola, Mary Anne Schilz, James Covert, University of Ottawa, Canada
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 7, Number 1, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
At the University of Ottawa, we have developed the first in a planned series of interactive multimedia programs to promote reflective decision-making skills in preservice teachers. This paper discusses the results of an evaluation of the use of the program with 58 student teachers in four seminar classes and assesses the implications for incorporating instructional elements and learning strategies to facilitate reflective thinking. Data was collected by means of self-report surveys, tracking data, and semistructured interviews. Evaluation results indicated that the students liked this instructional approach and found the scenarios depicted realistic. They also found the program easy to use, but focused nearly exclusively on the video portions to the exclusion of other program features designed to engender reflective decision-making. Tentative guidelines are advanced for the design of interactive multimedia intended to foster reflective or critical thinking.
Citation
Kenny, R.F., Andrews, B.W., Vignola, M.J., Schilz, M.A. & Covert, J. (1999). Towards Guidelines for the Design of Interactive Multimedia Instruction: Fostering the Reflective Decision-Making of Preservice Teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 13-31. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8955/.
© 1999 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Armaline, W.D., & Hoover, R.L. (1989). Field experience as a vehicle for
- Patton, M. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
A multi-component model for assessing learning objects: The learning object evaluation metric (LOEM)
Robin Kay, Liesel Knaack & Liesel Knaack
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 24, No. 5 (Jan 01, 2008)
-
A Formative Analysis of Instructional Strategies for Using Learning Objects
Robin Kay, Liesel Knaack & Bill Muirhead, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 20, No. 3 (July 2009) pp. 295–315
-
Evaluating the Use of Learning Objects for Secondary School Science
Robin Kay & Liesel Knaack, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Canada
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 26, No. 4 (October 2007) pp. 261–289
-
INTIME (Integrating New Technologies into the Methods of Education): A PT3 Catalyst Grant
Masha Plakhotnik, Univ. of Northern Iowa, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (2001) pp. 2053–2055
-
InTime: A PT3 Catalyst Grant
Masha Plakhotnik, Univ. of Northern Iowa, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (2001) pp. 2050–2052
-
Integrating Technology to Enhance Performance Assessment
Linda Quinn & Lori Olafson, University of Nevada, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2002 (2002) pp. 1405–1409
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.