Abstract

This paper reviews the development of thinking about student dropout in general and also how this thinking has been adapted in the field of open and distance learning. It looks critically at the two basic research approaches: surveys of dropouts to ask them for their reasons, and studies that looked at progress in relation into likely predictive variables. Then it considers the seminal work of Tinto and examines two pieces of research in open and distance learning that have attempted to empirically test his longitudinal model. In conclusion, a case is made for interventionary tactics rather than a grand theory of such a multi-faceted phenomenon.

Citation

Woodley, A. (2004). Conceptualizing Student Dropout in Part-Time Distance Education: Pathologizing the Normal?. Open Learning, 19(1), 47-63. Retrieved August 14, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/68821/.

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• distance education
• Dropouts
• Research Methodology