You are here:

The effect of home computer use on children’s cognitive and non-cognitive skills
ARTICLE

Economics of Education Review Volume 29, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the effect of using a home computer on children’s development. In most OECD countries 70% or more of the households have a computer at home and children use computers quite extensively, even at very young ages. We use data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC), which follows an Australian cohort born in 1999/2000. Skills and computer usage information is collected when children are approximately 5 and 7 years old. For cognitive skills, our results indicate that computer time has a positive effect. For non-cognitive skills the evidence is mixed, the effect depending on the score and the age of the children. We test the robustness of our results by comparing OLS, IV and Value Added estimators. Generally, the IV estimates are larger and the Value Added estimates lower than the OLS ones. However the pattern of the results is quite consistent.

Citation

Fiorini, M. (2010). The effect of home computer use on children’s cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Economics of Education Review, 29(1), 55-72. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ870287

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning . Economic Journal, 112(482), pp. 735-765.
  2. Banerjee, A., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. (2007). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), pp. 1235-1264.
  3. Barrow, L., Markham, L., & Rouse, C.E. (2009). Technology’s edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction . American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1).
  4. Beltran, D. O., Das, K. K., & Fairlie, R. W. (2008). Are computers good for children? The effects of home computers on educational outcomes. CEPR Discussion Papers 576. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University (forthcoming in Economic Inquiry).
  5. Berlinski, S., Galiani, S., & Manacorda, M. (2008). Giving children a better start: Preschool attendance and school-age profiles . Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), pp. 1416-1440.
  6. Bernal, R., & Keane, M.P. (2009). Quasi-structural estimation of a model of child care choices and child cognitive ability production . Journal of Econometrics.
  7. Cameron, S.V., & Heckman, J.J. (1998). Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: Models and evidence for five cohorts of American males . Journal of Political Economy, 106(2), pp. 262-333.
  8. Cameron, S.V., & Heckman, J.J. (2001). The dynamics of educational attainment for black, hispanic and white males . Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), pp. 455-499.
  9. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J.J. (2007). The technology of skill formation . American Economic Review, 97(2), pp. 31-47.
  10. Cunha, F., Heckman, J.J., & Lochner, L. (2006). Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation .
  11. Dahl, G. B., & Lochner, L. (2005). The impact of family income on child achievement. Working Paper 11279. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J.M. (2008). Preschool television viewing and adolescent test scores historical evidence from the coleman study . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), pp. 279-323.
  13. Gurian, M. (2002). Boys and girls learn differently! .
  14. Heckman, J.J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior . Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), pp. 411-482.
  15. Keane, M.P., & Wolpin, K.I. (1997). The career decisions of young men . Journal of Political Economy, 105(3), pp. 473-522.
  16. Keane, M.P., & Wolpin, K.I. (2001). The effect of parental transfers and borrowing constraints on educational attainment . International Economic Review, 42(4), pp. 1051-1103.
  17. Rouse, C.E., & Krueger, A.B. (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: A randomized evaluation of a “Scientifically-Based” reading program . Economics of Education Review, 23(4), pp. 323-338.
  18. Schmidt, M.E., & Anderson, D.R. (2007). Children and television: Fifty years of research .
  19. Schmitt, J., & Wadsworth, J. (2006). Is there an impact of household computer ownership on children’s educational attainment in Britain? . Economics of Education Review, 25(6), pp. 659-673.
  20. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E.F. (2001). The impact of computer use on children’s and adolescents’ development . Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), pp. 7-30.
  21. Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R. E., Greenfield, P. M., & Gross, E. F. (2000). The impact of home computer use on children’s activities and development.
  22. Todd, P.E., & Wolpin, K.I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement . Economic Journal, 113(485), pp. 3-33.
  23. Todd, P.E., & Wolpin, K.I. (2007). The production of cognitive achievement in children: Home, school, and racial test score gaps . Journal of Human Capital, 1(1), pp. 91-136.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.