"Islands of Innovation" or "Comprehensive Innovation." Assimilating Educational Technology in Teaching, Learning, and Management: A Case Study of School Networks in Israel
ARTICLE
Orit Avidov-Ungar, The Open University, Israel
IJELLO Volume 6, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
Abstract
Introducing educational technology platforms for teaching, learning, and school management is one kind of technological innovation. There are two patterns of adopting innovation: “comprehensive innovation” – encompassing most of the organization – and “islands of innovation” - limited to certain groups within it. The aim of this research is to examine the features of organizational culture in a school network regarding the implementation of educational technology and whether this pattern of change reflects “islands of innovation” or “comprehensive innovation.” Seven schools were studied through qualitative research: semi-structured in-depth interviews with key figures and content analysis of the network’s vision. The findings reveal a gap between the values of the management and those of the teachers and forces encouraging the adoption of new teaching methods reinforcing the belief that educational technologies can help improve existing teaching and develop alternative pedagogies. However, these forces only manage to create islands of innovation that do not expand into comprehensive innovation. The gap in values creates ineffectiveness that prevents expansion. The “islands” turn out to be disrupters of innovation that do not allow the first degree change to turn into a second degree change or for this latter to turn into comprehensive innovation throughout the organization.
Citation
Avidov-Ungar, O. (2010). "Islands of Innovation" or "Comprehensive Innovation." Assimilating Educational Technology in Teaching, Learning, and Management: A Case Study of School Networks in Israel. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6(1), 259-280. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44786/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. Ben–Peretz, M. (2009). Policy making in education: A holistic approach in response to global changes. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
- Butt, R.L., & Raynolds, D. (1989). Studying the nature and development of teachers’ knowledge using collaborative autobiography. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 403-419.
- Butt, R.L., Raynolds, D., McCue, G., & Jamagishi, L. (1994). Collaborative autobiography and the teacher’s voice. In F.I. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 51-98). New-York: Teacher College
- Christensen, M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T.M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 94.
- Cook, J., Holley, D., & Andrew, D. (2007). A stakeholder approach to implementing e-learning in a university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 784-794.
- Cunningham, C.A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25(2), 46-61.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Policy and change: Getting beyond bureaucracy. In A. Hargreaves, A. Liberman, M. Fullen, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 642-667).
- De Freitas, S. & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-leaning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81-95.
- Del Val, M.P., & Fuentes, C.M. (2003). Resistance to change: A literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(12), 148-155.
- DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
- Dodgson, M., & Bessant, J. (1996). Effective innovation policy: A new approach. London: International Thompson Business Press.
- Finley, L., & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: Teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319-337.
- Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed) (pp. 645-670). Thousand
- Fullan, M. (2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 113-122.
- Fullan, M., & Smith, G. (1999). Technology and the problem of change. Available at http://www.michaelfullan.ca/Articles_98-99/12_99.pdf Goldhaber, D.D., & Eide, E.R. (2002). What we know (and need to know) about impact of school choice reforms on disadvantaged students? Harvard Educational Review, 29(8), 2-21.
- Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2010). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in school. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2).
- Hanson, M. (2001). Institutional theory and educational change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 637-661.
- Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41.
- Koberg, C.S., Detienne, D.R., & Heppard, K.A. (2003). An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 21-45.
- Kotter, C.J.P., & Cohen, D.S. (2002). Creative ways to empower action to change the organization: Cases in point. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 22(1), 73-82.
- Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration& Leadership, 36(2), 289-303.
- Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradiction, and emerging confluences. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed) (pp. 163188),
- Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand: Oxford University Press.
- Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research-A philosophic and practical guide. London: Falmer Press.
- McDermott, C.M., & O’Connor, G.C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 424–438.
- Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Mioduser D., Nachmias, R., Forkosh, B.A., & Tubin, D. (2004). Sustainability, scalability and transferability of ICT-based pedagogical innovations in Israeli schools. Education, Communication& Information, 4(1), 71-82.
- Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Tubin, D., & Forkosh, A. (2006). Pedagogical innovation involving information technologies and communications. The Center for Science and Technology Education, School of Education, Tel Aviv University. Ramot, Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew).
- Morrison, K. (1998). Management theories for educational change. SAGE Publications Company, London. Avidov-Ungar
- Nichols, M. (2008). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 598-609.
- Ogobonna, E., & Harris, L.C. (2003). Innovation organizational structure and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 512-533.
- Pfeifer, T., Schmitt, R., & Voigt, T. (2005). Managing change: Quality-oriented design of strategic change processes. The TQM Magazine, 15(4), 297-308.
- Raz, A. (2002). Emotions at work: Normative control, culture and organizations in Japan and America. Harvard University Press (Asia center).
- Raz. A. (2006) Managerial culture, workplace culture and situated curricula in organizational learning. Organization Studies, 27(2), 165-182.
- Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
- Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (6th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
- Raymond, D., & Surrenant, M. (1988). Investigating teachers’ knowledge through ethnographic and biographic approaches: A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research, New Orleans.
- Salmon, G. (2005). Strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical Innovation. The Association for Learning Technology Journal, 13(3), 201-217.
- Sarason, S.B. (1995). The school culture and the processes of change. In S.B. Sarason, School change: The personal development of a point of view (Ch. 6, pp. 65-84). Teacher College, Columbia University,
- Scott, W.R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
- Stake, R.E. (1988). Case study methods in education research: Seeking sweet water. In R.M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary method for research in education (pp. 254-300). Washington, DC: American Educational
- Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Policy cycles and institutional trends. In D. Tyack & L. Cuban, Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform (Ch. 2, pp. 40-59). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London,
- White, S. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning and institutional change– some organizational perspectives on campus-wide e-leaning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 840-850.
- Zimmerman, J. (2006).Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238-249.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References