You are here:

Has Distance Learning Become More Flexible? Reflections of a Distance Learning Student
ARTICLE

, Australian Catholic University, Australia

IJELLO Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

This paper provides insight into the way in which distance learning had changed over the past 30 years from the perspective of the author as a distance learning student. The question is then asked as to whether current practice is reducing flexibility for distance learning students? The paper starts with a discussion of flexible learning and the different factors that need to be considered when making distance learning flexible for students. The paper then describes the author’s experiences as a distance learning student in the early 1980s and compares it to her experiences as a student in 2006-2008. The experiences were compared using various dimensions of flexibility. The main dimensions used were flexibility of content, assessment, instructional approach, course delivery, time, and learning styles. While flexibility had improved in some areas, improving the pedagogical design by engaging students on an ongoing basis had also decreased flexibility in others. The paper concludes with a look to the future and factors that online designers might consider in balancing different types of flexible learning activities.

Citation

Thomas, T. (2012). Has Distance Learning Become More Flexible? Reflections of a Distance Learning Student. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8(1), 39-49. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 15, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ardito, C., Costabile, M., de Marsico, M., Lanzilotti R., Levialdi S., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. (2006). An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(3), 270-283.
  2. Baath, J. (1982). Distance students' learning— Empirical findings and theoretical deliberations. Distance Education, 3(1), 6-27.
  3. Baggaley, J.N. (2008). Where did distance education go wrong? Distance Education, 29(1), 39-51.
  4. Bassett, P. (2011). How do students view asynchronous online discussions as a learning experience? Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 69-79. Retrieved 5 May 2012 from http://www.ijello.org/Volume7/IJELLOv7p069-079Bassett744.pdf Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., & Harper, B. (2009). Researching learning design in open, distance, and flexible learning: Investigating approaches to supporting design processes and practices. Distance Education, 30(2), 175-177.
  5. Bowles, M.S. (2004). Learning to E-Learn Project: Rediscovering the benefits of e-learning. Unitas Knowledge Centre. Retrieved 5 May 2012 from http://www.marcbowles.com/ifwf/Portals/0/Future%20and%20Elearning%20ICETA2004.pdf Brindley, J.E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L.M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-18.
  6. Dalsgaard, B. (2005). Pedagogical quality in e-learning. E-Learning and Education Journal (1). Retrieved 27 February 2012 from https://eleed.campussource.de/archive/1/78/index_html/ Hagel, P., & Shaw, R.N. (2006). Students' perceptions of study modes. Distance Education, 27(3), 283302.
  7. Marland, P.W., & Store, R.E. (1982). Some instructional strategies for improved learning from distance teaching materials. Distance Education, 3(1), 72 – 106.
  8. ThomasMenchaca, M.P., & Bekele, T.A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231 – 252.
  9. Nikolova, I. & Collis, B. (1998). Flexible learning and design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 59-72.
  10. Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers& Education, 53, 1285-1296.
  11. Sadler-Smith, E. & Smith, P. (2004) Strategies for accommodating individual’s styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 395-412.
  12. Tremblay, R. (2006). Technical evaluation report 55: Best practices and collaborative software in online teaching. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-5.
  13. Van den Brande, L. (1993). Flexible and distance learning-A special report. Wiley and Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General XIII, Brussels.
  14. Willems, J. (2005). Flexible learning: Implications of “when-ever”, “where-ever” and “what-ever”. Distance Education, 26(3), 429-435.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links