![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/SITE.jpg)
Graduate Students' Preferences in Online Instruction
PROCEEDINGS
Kimberly Livengood, Mary McGlamery, Angelo State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Technology has touched every aspect of life, including the way people learn. Online courses are in increased demand at colleges and universities. Online courses have transformed the way we live and learn. Various technologies have been employed to deliver course content in online programs. This study investigates graduate students' preferences for online strategies, websites, and programs. Implications for program improvement are discussed.
Citation
Livengood, K. & McGlamery, M. (2011). Graduate Students' Preferences in Online Instruction. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 471-475). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/36311/.
References
View References & Citations Map- Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
- Perkins-Gough, D., Snyder, D., & Licciardi, B. (2004). The communication age: The 1990s and ASCD. Educational Leadership, 61(4), 94-101.
- Cetron, M. & Cetron, K. (2004). A forecast for schools: Projections from a noted futurist and an educator provide direction for schools. Educational Leadership, 61(4), 22-29.
- Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Educative mentoring: A focus on teacher development. Paper presented at the annual Symposium on Teacher Induction, San Jose, CA.
- Ferdig, R.M., & Trammell, K.D. (2004). Content delivery in 'Blogsphere'. THE Journal, Retrieved September 29, 2010, from http://thejournal.com/articles/16626. Geis, G. & Smith, M. (1992). The function of evaluation. In Stolovitch & Keeps (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: A comprehensive for analyzing and solving performance problems in organizations (pp. 130-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Inc.
- Jones, P., West, E., & Stevens, D. (2006). I realized I knew nothing, that I had an awful lot to learn, and that I would have to help others see teachers in a different light(cid:1): A international perspective on effective moments of teacher learning. British Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 82-90.
- Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
- Kirkpatrick, D. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
- Maki, R.H. & Maki, W.S. (2007). Online courses. In F.T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Cognition (2nd ed., pp.527-552). New York: Wiley& Sons, Ltd.
- Raaij, E.M., & Schepers, J.J.L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers and Education, 50 (3), 838-852.
- Richert, A. (2005). Inquiry about practice: using web based materials to develop inquiry. Teaching Education, 16(4), 297-310.
- Rizopoulos, L., & McCarthy, P. (2009). Using online threaded discussions: Best practices for the digital learner. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37(4), 373-383.
- Russo, T.C. & Campbell, S.W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviors and medium. Distance Education, 25, 215-232.
- Single, P.B., & Muller, C.B. (2001). When email and mentoring unite: The implementation of a nationwide electronic mentoring program--MentorNet, the National Electronic Industrial Mentoring Network for Women in Engineering and Science. In L. Kyle (Ed.), Creating mentoring and coaching programs: Twelve case studies form the real world of training (pp. 107-122). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References