You are here:

State of the Art Student Support Services in an IEP Learning Center
ARTICLE

, ,

ORTESOL Journal Volume 32, Number 1, ISSN 0192-401X

Abstract

Intensive English language programs (IEPs) at American universities have the task of recruiting, retaining, and preparing international students for mainstream classes. In order to achieve these tasks, many programs have explored using supplemental instruction (SI) in the form of learning centers (LCs) to support their students. In this study, we investigate how and why students make use of an LC and its resources at Portland State University's Intensive English Language Program (IELP). Multiple strands of data were used, including observations of the LC in use, surveys of students and staff, and interviews with students to investigate student use of resources and their reasons for using those resources. While a majority of the students use computer resources, many of the students noted they use a variety of the resources offered each time they visit. We also examined student motivations for using the resources and noted five themes in the responses: the variety of resources, the LC's accessibility, the physical space, personal contact, and community. We conclude our research with recommendations for promoting, maintaining, and building community in an IEP LC.

Citation

Hanson, J., Maxwell, J. & Mulder, M. (2015). State of the Art Student Support Services in an IEP Learning Center. ORTESOL Journal, 32(1), 20-32. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on January 9, 2019. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Arendale, D.R. (1994). Understanding the supplemental instruction model. New Directions For Teaching& Learning, (60), 11-21.
  2. Arendale, D.R. (2002). History of Supplemental Instruction (SI): Mainstreaming of developmental education. In D.B. Lundell, & J.L. Higbee (Eds.), Histories of developmental education (pp. 15-28). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on
  3. Collis-Burgess, A. (2014, February 25). English Language Support to Help International Graduate Students. The Cornell Daily Sun. Retrieved from http://cornellsun.com/blog/2014/02/25/english-language-support-to-helpinternational-graduate-students/
  4. Congos D.H. & Schoeps, N. (1993). Does supplemental instruction really work and what is it anyway?. Studies in Higher Education, 18(2), 165-176,
  5. Conard-Salvo, T., & Spartz, J.M. (2012). Listening to revise: What a study about text-to-speech software taught us about students’ expectations for technology use in the writing center. The Writing Center Journal, 32(1), 40-59.
  6. Fisher, K. (2014, February 19). Campuses Focus More on Meeting International Students’ Needs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Campuses-Focus-More-onMeeting/144825?cid=megamenu
  7. Jarvis, H., & Szymczyk, M. (2010). Student views on learning grammar with web-and book-based materials. ELT Journal 64(1), 32-44.
  8. Kalikoff, B. (2001). From coercion to collaboration: A mosaic approach to writing center assessment. The Writing Lab Newsletter, 26(1), 5-7.
  9. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Microstrategies for language teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  10. Littlejohn, A. (1985). Learner choice in language study. ELT Journal 39, 253-261
  11. Lucas, T., & Wagner, S. (1999). Facilitating secondary English language learners' transition into the mainstream. TESOL Journal,8(4), 6-13.
  12. McCarthy, A., Smuts, B., & Cosser, M. (1997). Assessing the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A critique and a case study. Studies In Higher Education, 22(2), 221.
  13. Mulder, M. (2013). [IELP usage statistics]. Unpublished raw data.
  14. Murphy, J.M. (1992). From caterpillar to butterfly: Using modern technology within the current paradigm of ESL instruction. TESL Canada Journal, 9(2), 80-98.
  15. Ross, P.J. (2003). Listening skills and language labs: A case study of a college ESL program. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (200503233).
  16. Spratt, M.(1999).How good are we at knowing what learners like? System,27(2),141-155.
  17. University of Missouri Kansas City (2013, December 1). The International Center for Supplemental Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.umkc.edu/asm/si/index.shtml#
  18. Yang, N.D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27(4), 515−536.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts