You are here:

Using data to support instructional decision making: Designing a progress monitoring system to use with students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
PROCEEDING

, Penn State University, United States ; , University of Minnesota, United States ; , Penn State, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Ave: PM is a web-based progress monitoring system we designed to help teachers to monitor their children's literacy The software presents students with brief assessments and uses novel interfaces to help teachers score the assessments Scoring data are recorded in a database and presented to teachers in a visualization system to help them to determine whether individual students are making adequate progress We will present the results of two investigations First, we will report data addressing the reliability of two of the assessments included in the software Second, we will present the results of a study exploring how teachers use data to improve their instruction Teachers reviewed three case studies supported by various types of data and identified which data sets showed that a student was making progress and were most informative

Citation

Hooper, S., Rose, S. & Sperling, R. (2018). Using data to support instructional decision making: Designing a progress monitoring system to use with students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1503-1510). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Allinder, R.M., & Eccarius, M. (1999). Exploring the technical adequacy of curriculum-based. Measurement in reading for children who use manually coded English. Exceptional Children, 65(2), 271-283.
  2. Bell, S.M., Miller, K.C., McCallum, R.S., Hopkins, M., & Hilton-Prillhart, A. (2012). Unique screener of reading fluency and comprehension for adolescents and adults. Psychology, 3(1), 45.
  3. Çil, E., & Kar, H. (2015). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Interpretations Of Graphs: ACross Sectional Study. Science Educator, 24(1), 36.
  4. Espin, C.A., Wayman, M.M., Deno, S.L., McMaster, K.L., & De Rooij, M. (2017). Data-Based Decision-Making: Developing a Method for Capturing Teachers’ Understanding of CBM Graphs. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32(1), 8–21.
  5. Evers, A. (2001). The revised Dutch rating system for test quality. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 155-182.
  6. Farrell, C. & Marsh, J. (2016). Metrics matter: How properties of data shape teachers’ instructional responses. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(3), 423-462.
  7. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21(1), 45-58.
  8. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28(4), 659.
  9. Marschark, M., & Knoors, H. (2012). Educating deaf children: Language, cognition, and learning. Deafness& Education International, 14(3), 136-160.
  10. Marschark, M., Lang, H.G., & Albertini, J.A. (2002). Educating deaf students: From research to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Qi, S., & Mitchell, R.E. (2012). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard of hearing students: Past, present and future. Journal of Deaf Studies& Deaf Education, 17(1),1-18.
  12. Reschly, A.L., Busch, T.W., Betts, J., Deno, S.L., & Long, J.D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427-469.
  13. Rose, S., McAnally, P., Barkmeier, L., Virnig, S., & Long, J. (2008). Technical report# 9: Silent Reading Fluency Test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to growth for students who are deaf and hard of hearing at the elementary, middle school, and high school levels. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Research on Progress Monitoring.Rose, S., McAnally, P., & Quigley, S.P. (2004). Language practices with deaf children (3rd ed.) Austin, TX: Pro Ed.
  14. Rose, S. & Paulson, A. (2015). Progress monitoring practices among teachers of the deaf in Minnesota. Report to the Minnesota Commission on Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Schifter, C.C. Natarajan, U., Ketelhut, D.J.., Kirchgessnew, A. (2014). Data-driven decision making: Facilitating teacher use of student data to inform instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 419-432.
  15. Shin, J., Deno, S.L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 164-172.
  16. Tichá, R., Espin, C.A., & Wayman, M.M. (2009). Reading Progress Monitoring for Secondary School Students: Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity to Growth of Reading Aloud and Maze Selection Measures. Learning Disabilities Research& Practice, 24(3), 132-142.
  17. Urbanski, A. (2004). Teachers’ use of data to improve student learning. Retrieved 3/1/2018 from: http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/NES_Publications/2004_02Urbanski_531_1.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts