You are here:

K-12 STEM Educator Autonomy: An Investigation of School Influence and Classroom Control
ARTICLE

, , , ,

Journal of STEM Education Volume 18, Number 5, ISSN 1557-5284 Publisher: Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Full Text

Abstract

Over the past decade, teacher autonomy within the formal educational system has been a central topic of discussion among educational stakeholders. Research has indicated that teacher influence has an identifiable relationship with teacher retention, which is also a leading concern within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. However, examination of educational influence and control that is discipline specific is currently not a prevalent line of research. This study explored influence over school policy and classroom control among in-service science, technology, and mathematics educators within the United States. The National Center for Education Statistics restricted access dataset enabled examination of the study research questions. Specifically, the Schools and Staffing Survey Teacher Questionnaire (SASS-TQ) was employed for the purposes of this investigation. Hypothesis testing revealed differences between science and technology education, science and mathematics education, and technology and mathematics education teachers concerning influence over school policy and individual classroom control.

Citation

Ernst, J., Williams, T., Clark, A., Kelly, D. & Sutton, K. (2018). K-12 STEM Educator Autonomy: An Investigation of School Influence and Classroom Control. Journal of STEM Education, 18(5),. Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE). Retrieved August 16, 2024 from .

© 2018 Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Blase, J., Kirby, P. (2009). Bringing Out the Best in Teachers: What Effective Principals Do, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  2. Bogler, R., & Nir, A.E. (2012). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction: What’s empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306.
  3. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The Influence of School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303-333.
  4. Butler, S.G. (2010). Analysis of a conceptual framework to express teacher job satisfaction (Order No. 3427284). ProQuest Dissertations& Theses Global. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  5. Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. (2007). Improving teacher retention with supportive workplace conditions. Retrieved from http://www.centerforcsri.org
  6. Collie, R.J., Shapka, J.D., & Perry, N.E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189.
  7. Dierking, R.C., & Fox, R.F. (2013). “Changing the way Iteach”: Building teacher knowledge, confidence, and autonomy. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 129-144.
  8. Dondero, G.M. (1997). Organizational climate and teacher autonomy: Implications for educational reform. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(5), 218-221.
  9. Eklund, N. (2008). How was your day at school? Improving dialogue about teacher job satisfaction. Minneapolis: Search Institute Press.
  10. Ernst, J.V. & Williams, T.O. (2014). Technology and engineering education accommodation service profile: An ex post facto research design. Journal of Technology Education, 26(1), 64-74.
  11. Friedrichsen, P., Chval, K.B., & Tuescher, D. (2007). Strategies and sources of support for beginning teachers of science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 107(5), 169-181.
  12. Gkolia, A., Belias, D.D., & Koustelios, A.A. (2014). Teacher’s job satisfaction and self-efficacy: A review. European Scientific Journal, 10(22) 321-342.
  13. Gonzalez, G. (2011). Teacher autonomy in light of managed instruction (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Central. (Order No. 3474658)
  14. Gunbayi, I. (2007). School climate and teachers’ perceptions on climate factors: Research into nine urban high schools, The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3), 1-10.
  15. Haynes, N.M., Emmons, C., & Ben-Avie, M. (1997). School climate as a factor in student adjustment
  16. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. New York: Wiley.
  17. Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper and Row.
  18. Hutchison, L.F. (2012). Addressing the STEM teacher shortage in American schools: Ways to recruit and retain effective STEM teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5-6), 541.
  19. Ingersoll, R.M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16-30.
  20. Jackson, K.M. (2012). Influence matters: the link between principal and teacher influence over school policy and teacher turnover. Journal of School Leadership, 22(5), 875-901.
  21. Jorde-Bloom, P. (1986). Teacher job satisfaction: A framework for analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly1, 167-183.
  22. Lee, A.N., Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment: Teachers’ perceptions of principal’s and immediate supervisor’s empowering behaviors, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41(1), 67-79.
  23. Liu, X.S. (2007). The effect of teacher influence at school on first-year teacher attrition: A multilevel analysis of the Schools and Staffing Survey for 1999–2000.
  24. MacNeil, A.J., Prater, D.L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73-84.
  25. Marvel, J., Lyter, D.M., Peltola, P., Strizek, G.A. & Morton, B.A. (2007). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004-05 teacher follow-up survey. U.S.
  26. Newton, X.A., Jang, H., Nunes, N., & Stone, E. (2010). Recruiting, preparing, and retaining high quality secondary mathematics and science teachers for urban schools: The Cal Teach experimental program. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(1), 21-40.
  27. Perrachione, B.A., Petersen, G.J., & Rosser, V.J. (2008). Why do they stay? Elementary teachers’ perceptions of job satisfaction and retention. The Professional Educator, 32(2), 1-17.
  28. Short, P.M., & Rinehart, J.S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 951-960.
  29. Skaalvik, E.M., Skaalvik, S. (2014) Teacher self-ffficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77.
  30. Stockard, J., & Lehman, M.B. (2004). Influences on the satisfaction and retention of 1st-year teachers: The importance of effective school management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 742-771.
  31. Strong, L.E.G., Yoshida, R.K. (2014). Teachers’ autonomy in today’s educational climate: current perceptions from an acceptable instrument. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 50(2), 123-145.
  32. Zhang, Z. (2006). Retaining K--12 teachers in education: A study on teacher job satisfaction and teacher retention (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Central. (Order No. 3218433) Jeremy V. Ernst is Director of the Office of Educational Research and Outreach and Program Leader of the Integrative STEM Education graduate program at Virginia Tech. He also serves as a Faculty Fellow

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links

Also Read

Related Collections