![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/irrodl.jpg)
Online Learning in a South African Higher Education Institution: Determining the Right Connections for the Student
ARTICLE
Dorothy Queiros, University of South Africa ; Mary de Villiers, University of Africa
IRRODL Volume 17, Number 5, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
Online learning is a means of reaching marginalised and disadvantaged students within South Africa. Nevertheless, these students encounter obstacles in online learning. This research investigates South African students’ opinions regarding online learning, culminating in a model of important connections (facets that connect students to their learning and the institution). Most participants had no prior experience with online learning. Their perceptions and barriers to learning may apply to other developing countries as well.A cross-sequential research design was employed using a survey among 58 fourth-year students who were studying a traditional paper-based module via open distance learning. The findings indicated certain essential connections: first, a strong social presence (through timely feedback, interaction with facilitators, peer-to-peer contact, discussion forums, and collaborative activities); second, technological aspects (technology access, online learning self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy); and third, tools (web sites, video clips). The study revealed low levels of computer/internet access at home, which is of concern in an ODL milieu heading online. Institutions moving to online learning in developing countries should pay close attention to their students’ situations and perceptions, and develop a path that would accommodate both the disadvantaged and techno-savvy students without compromising quality of education and learning. The article culminates in practical recommendations that encompass the main findings to help guide institutions in developing countries as they move towards online teaching and learning.
Citation
Queiros, D. & de Villiers, M. (2016). Online Learning in a South African Higher Education Institution: Determining the Right Connections for the Student. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 15, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173624/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529952.pdf
- Asunka, S. (2008). Online learning in higher education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Ghanaian university
- Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2004). A path analytic study of the determinants of college students’
- Blackmom, S.J., & Major, C. (2012). Student experiences in online courses: A qualitative research synthesis. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(2), 77-85.
- Brookfield, S.D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Butcher, N. (2014). Technologies in higher education: Mapping the terrain. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. Retrieved from http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214737.pdf
- Çakiroğlu, Ü. (2014). Evaluating students’ perspectives about virtual classrooms with regard to seven principles of good practice. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1-19.
- Carlson, J., & Jesseman, D. (2011). Have we asked them yet? Graduate student preferences for webenhanced learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 125-134.
- Chang, S., & Tung, F. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’ behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71-83.
- Chikering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 2-6. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf. Accessed
- Fung, Y.Y.H. (2004). Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(2), 135-149.
- Geduld, B. (2013). Students’ experiences of demands and challenges in open distance education: A South African case. Progressio, 35(2), 102-125.
- Geri, N. (2012). The resonance factor: Probing the impact of video on student retention in distance learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8, 1-13.
- Glenn, J.M. (2000). Teaching the net generation. Business Education Forum, 54 (3):6-14.
- Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global
- Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, anxiety, and learning in online versus face-to-face medium. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 141-154.
- Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, V., Stankovic, S., & Vaskovic, J. (2014). Using supplementary video in
- Lund, C., & Volet, S. (1998). Barriers to studying online for the first time: Students’ perceptions.
- Mbati, L.A. (2012). Online learning for social constructivism: Creating a conducive environment. Progressio, 34(2), 99-119.
- McGinley, V., Osgood, J., & Kenney, J. (2012). Exploring graduate students’ perceptual differences of face-to-face and online learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(3), 177-182.
- McKimm, J., Jollie, C., & Cantillon, P. (2003). Web-based learning. British Medical Journal, 326(7394), 870-873.
- McMahon, M., & Oliver, R. (2001). Promoting self-regulated learning in an online environment. EdMedia 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia& Telecommunications, 1299-1305. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Monk, D. (2001). Open/distance learning in the United Kingdom. Why do people do it here (and elsewhere)? Perspectives in Education, 19(3), 53-66.
- Mtebe, J.S. & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating perceived barriers to the use of open educational
- Muuro, M.E., Wagacha, W.P., Oboko, R., & Kihoro, J. (2014). Students’ perceived challenges in an online
- Pollard, E., & Hillage, J. (2001). Exploring e-learning. Report 376. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
- Queiros, D.R., de Villiers, M.R., van Zyl, C., Conradie, N. & Van Zyl, L. (2015). Rich environments for
- Samuels-Peretz, D. (2014). Ghosts, stars, and learning online: Analysis of interaction patterns in student online discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 50-71.
- Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset: Vol II. The paradox of faculty voices: Views and
- Tait, A. (2003). Reflections on student support in open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1-10.
- Todhunter, B. (2013). LOL – limitations of online learning– are we selling the open and distance education message short? Distance Education, 34(2), 232-252.
- Tsai, C. (2012). The role of teacher’s initiation in online pedagogy. Education+ Training, 54(6), 456-471.
- Van Rij, V. (2015). Annex to discussion paper by Victor van Rij. Retrieved from http://iite.unesco.org/files/news/639201/Annex_to_Discussion_Paper_For Esight_on_HE_and
- Zhang, J. & Walls, R. (2006). Instructor's self-perceived pedagogical principle implementation in the online environment. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 413-426.
- Zhang, K., Peng, S., & Hung, J. (2009). Online collaborative learning in a project-based learning
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References