Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the learning process exhibited in restrained online debates in terms of to what extent each of Bloom's six levels of cognitive learning were exhibited among four types of message (argument, critique, evidence, and explanation). Thirty-three graduate students enrolled in an online entry-level course in distance learning participated in this study. The threaded discussion postings from four structured online debates were analyzed. The results indicated that five of the six levels of cognitive learning (except for knowledge learning) were achieved to a certain extent among the four types of postings. Chi square tests indicated that higher levels of learning were most likely to be exhibited in critique and argument postings. Message-response exchanges ending with critiques or starting with argument messages were most likely to elicit higher levels responses. The results were discussed in light of better understanding of student learning and implications for instructional designs of discussion topics and restraints.

Citation

Jin, L. & Jeong, A. (2013). Learning Achieved in Structured Online Debates: Levels of Learning and Types of Postings. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 41(6), 1141-1152. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157012/.

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• computer mediated communication
• Criticism
• distance education
• electronic learning
• Graduate students
• Introductory Courses
• Learning Processes
• Persuasive Discourse
• Statistical Analysis