Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Video Modeling, Video Prompting, and Video Modeling on Task Completion by Young Adults with Moderate Intellectual Disability
ARTICLE
Linda C. Mechling, Kevin M. Ayres, Kathryn J. Bryant, Ashley L. Foster
ETADD Volume 49, Number 4, ISSN 2154-1647
Abstract
This study compared the effects of three procedures (video prompting: VP, video modeling: VM, and continuous video modeling: CVM) on task completion by three high school students with moderate intellectual disability. The comparison was made across three sets of fundamentally different tasks (putting away household items in clusters of two items; multi-step cleaning tasks whereby each step in the task was completed one time; and multi-component folding tasks whereby steps were performed repetitively). The study combined a multiple probe across behaviors design with an adapted alternating treatments design replicated across three participants. Overall, VP was more effective across the three students for 6 of the 9 tasks, followed by CVM (2 of 9 tasks), and VM (1 of 9 tasks). These data further suggest that the type of task and student characteristics may influence the effectiveness of the three video procedures.
Citation
Mechling, L.C., Ayres, K.M., Bryant, K.J. & Foster, A.L. (2014). Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Video Modeling, Video Prompting, and Video Modeling on Task Completion by Young Adults with Moderate Intellectual Disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 491-504. Retrieved August 12, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/155976/.
![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/eric.png)
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
Cited By
View References & Citations Map-
Use of Video Prompting for Inclusion of Students with Intellectual Disabilities
Kalynn Hall, Florida Atlantic University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 2771–2772
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.