You are here:

Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Video Modeling, Video Prompting, and Video Modeling on Task Completion by Young Adults with Moderate Intellectual Disability
ARTICLE

, , ,

ETADD Volume 49, Number 4, ISSN 2154-1647

Abstract

This study compared the effects of three procedures (video prompting: VP, video modeling: VM, and continuous video modeling: CVM) on task completion by three high school students with moderate intellectual disability. The comparison was made across three sets of fundamentally different tasks (putting away household items in clusters of two items; multi-step cleaning tasks whereby each step in the task was completed one time; and multi-component folding tasks whereby steps were performed repetitively). The study combined a multiple probe across behaviors design with an adapted alternating treatments design replicated across three participants. Overall, VP was more effective across the three students for 6 of the 9 tasks, followed by CVM (2 of 9 tasks), and VM (1 of 9 tasks). These data further suggest that the type of task and student characteristics may influence the effectiveness of the three video procedures.

Citation

Mechling, L.C., Ayres, K.M., Bryant, K.J. & Foster, A.L. (2014). Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Video Modeling, Video Prompting, and Video Modeling on Task Completion by Young Adults with Moderate Intellectual Disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 491-504. Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.