You are here:

Culture, Complexity, and Informing: How Shared Beliefs Can Enhance Our Search for Fitness
PROCEEDINGS

, University of South Florida, United States

Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference, ISSN 1535-0703 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

Where shared knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and artifacts exist within a group, we have a culture. Culture plays a central role in informing research with two key themes being dominant: 1) the challenges presented by communicating across cultures, and 2) the impact of shared attributes, such as receptiveness to novel ideas, on a culture’s readiness to be informed. Recent research in organizational behavior suggests another perspective: that having a strong culture that is also adaptable can significantly improve an organization’s performance across a broad range of possible attributes. In other words, culture itself—independent of specifics—can exert a positive influence. The paper considers this proposition in the context of complex environments, finding considerable theoretical justification. Complex environments present major challenges to individuals seeking to improve their personal fitness; rules tend to be highly localized and fitness drops between states are often sharp. Using a combination of informing science models and simulations of complex landscapes, the paper demonstrates how imitating nearby neighbors proves to be a highly effective strategy as complexity grows. A strong culture fosters similarities across individuals or entities within a group, ensuring that participants have many self-similar neighbors to observe. The shared values can also serve to reduce the distortion we experience when we relate our own experiences and listen to the experiences of others. Encouraging the development of strong culture is not without risk, however. It is already well established that certain cultural traits—such as the unwillingness to attend to individuals outside the cultural grouping—can impede informing. There is also the danger that the underlying processes that produce strong culture—such as homophily and social contagion—may succeed too well in static environments, leading to values that are over-constrained and therefore do not adapt well. By understanding the informing implications of culture, we may be able to better avoid such obstacles in the future.

Citation

Gill, G. (2013). Culture, Complexity, and Informing: How Shared Beliefs Can Enhance Our Search for Fitness. In E. Cohen & E. Boyd (Eds.), Proceedings of Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference 2013 (pp. 71-98). Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203-226.
  2. Bennett, D. (2013). How a technophobic Oxford primatologist became Silicon Valley’s social networking guru. The Economist, 406(8819), 52-56.
  3. Campbell, D.J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40-52.
  4. Chase, N. (2008). An exploration of the culture of information technology: Focus on unrelenting change. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 3, 135-150. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/jiito/articles/JIITOv3p135-150Chase128.pdf Chatman, J., & Cha, S. (2003). Leading by leveraging culture. California Management Review, 45(4), 2034.
  5. Christakis, N.A., & Fowler, J.H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, NY: Little Brown.
  6. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  7. Cook, S., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373-390.
  8. Davis, M. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
  9. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
  10. Eagleton, T. (2000). The idea of culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  11. Fiske, S. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299-322.
  12. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  13. Gill, T.G. (2008). A psychologically plausible goal-based utility function. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 11, 227-252. Retrieved from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol11/ISJv11p227-252Gill220.pdf Gill, T.G. (2010). Informing business: Research and education on a rugged landscape. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.
  14. Gill, T.G. (2011). When what is useful is not necessarily true: The underappreciated conceptual scheme. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 14, 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol14/ISJv14p001-032Gill589.pdf Gill, T.G. (2012). Informing on a rugged landscape: Homophily versus expertise. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 15, 49-91. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol15/ISJv15p049-091Gill616.pdf
  15. Gill, T.G., & Hicks, R. (2006). Task complexity and informing science: A synthesis. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9, 1-30. Retrieved from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol9/v9p001-030Gill46.pdf Gill, T.G., & Murphy, W. (2011). Task complexity and design science. 9th International Conference on Education and Information Systems, Technologies and Applications: EISTA 2011, Orlando, FL, July 19th-22nd.
  16. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers. New York, NY: Little, Brown& Co.
  17. Goodenough, W. (1971). Culture, language and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  18. Groysberg, B. (2010). Chasing stars: The myth of talent and portability of performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  19. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48.
  20. Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick. New York, NY: Random House.
  21. Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69(2), 197-214.
  22. Heskett, J. (2011). The culture cycle: How to shape the unseen force that transforms performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
  23. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1984). Hofstede's culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417-433.
  24. Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic, constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709-720.
  25. Jamieson, K., & Hyland, P. (2006). Good intuition or fear and uncertainty: The effects of bias on information systems selection decisions. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9, 49-69. Retrieved from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol9/v9p049-069Jamieson60.pdf Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
  26. Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The origins of order. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  27. Kovacic, Z. (2001). Communicating culture: An exploratory study of the key concepts in Maori culture on Maori websites. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 4(2), 53-59. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol4/v4n2p053-059.pdf Kovacic, Z. (2005). The impact of national culture on worldwide eGovernment readiness. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 8, 143-158. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol8/v8p143-158Kova.pdf
  28. Lee, N.L., & Johson-Laird, P.N. (2006). Are there cross-cultural differences in reasoning? In R. Sun (Ed.), 28 Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  29. Levi-Strauss, C. (1973). Structuralism and ecology. Social Science Information, 12(1), 7-23.
  30. Malinowski, B. (1944). A scientific theory of culture and others essays. Chapel Hill, N. Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
  31. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
  32. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
  33. Morris, M., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949-971.
  34. Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
  35. O'Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
  36. GillPayne, J.W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387.
  37. Radcliffe-Brown, A. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society: Essays and addresses. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  38. Reiners, T., & Dreher, H. (2009). Culturally-based adaptive learning and concept analytics to guide educational website content integration. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 125-139. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol8/JITEv8p125-139Reiners436.pdf Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  39. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  40. Ryan, S., Windsor, J., Ibragimova, B., & Prybutok, V. (2010). Organizational practices that foster knowledge sharing: Validation across distinct national cultures. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 13, 139-164. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol13/ISJv13p139-164Ryan540.pdf Ryan, S., Magro, M., & Sharp, J. (2011). Exploring educational and cultural adaptation through social setworking sites. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 10, IIP 1-16.
  41. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture an organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.
  42. Sørnes, J., Stephens, K., Sætre, A., & Browning, L. (2004). The reflexivity between ICTs and business culture: Applying Hofstede’s theory to compare Norway and the United States. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 7, 1-30. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol7/v7p001-030-211.pdf Swindler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273286.
  43. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.
  44. Tooby, J., & Cosmonides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmonides, & J. Tooby, The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19136).
  45. Weick, K. (1987). Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. California Management Review, 29(2), 112-127.
  46. Wood, R. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60-82.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts