You are here:

Using Computer Based Modules to Prepare Pre-service Teachers for Future Learning in the School Classroom
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Vanderbilt University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-44-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

In the context of computer based modular design, we are currently investigating ways to bridge the gap between the university and the school classroom for pre-service elementary teachers. We have developed two authentic web-based cases in which pre-service teachers can investigate the process of supporting students' learning of significant mathematical ideas. In this paper we report on the results from our first pilot of the web-based modules in a master's level advanced teaching of elementary mathematics methodology course.

Citation

Tyler, L., Cobb, P. & Dean, C. (2002). Using Computer Based Modules to Prepare Pre-service Teachers for Future Learning in the School Classroom. In D. Willis, J. Price & N. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2002--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1308-1311). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bringelson, L.S. & Carey T. (2000). Different (key)strokes for different folks: designing online venues for professional communities. Educational Technology& Society, 3 (3), 58-64.
  2. Brophy, S. (2000). Guidelines for modular design. White paper: Vanderbilt University.
  3. Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Communicating and symbolizing in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 225 – 274). M ahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Schwartz, D.L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J.D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(2), 39-60.
  5. Schwartz, D.L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J.D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibility adaptive instructional designs. In Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: Volume II. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References