You are here:

Does the use of the TPACK model enhance digital pedagogies: We don’t understand the present so how can we imagine the future?
PROCEEDINGS

, Murdoch University

ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, ISBN 978-1-74138-403-1 Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Full Text

Abstract

This paper reflects on the use of the TPACK model in e -learning courses to enhance students’ ability to use technology in their learning and later in their professions and to introduce the concept of digital pedagogies. To maximize students’ learning, this model was disseminated in the design of the course, the learning activities and the assessment. The aim was to encourage students to become reflective learners and to create knowledge collaboratively. Different technological tools such as iPads, ePortfolio together with digital pedagogies were used to enhance the students’ learning experience and obtain students’ reflections and feedback on the unit. Digital pedagogies refer to teaching–learning approaches in which new technologies change the way we teach. From the thirty postgraduate students in the unit, there were different responses to digital pedagogies. Some felt it transformed their learning while others resisted and did not participate in the interactive spirit of the class.

Citation

Maor, D. (2013). Does the use of the TPACK model enhance digital pedagogies: We don’t understand the present so how can we imagine the future?. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 531-540). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Albion, P.R., Jamieson-Proctor, R. & Finger, G. (2010). Auditing the TPACK Confidence of Australian Pre-Service Teachers: The TPACK Confidence Survey (TCS). In Maddux, C.D., Ginson, D. & Dodge, B. (Eds.) Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2010. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) Chesapeake, VA.
  2. Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292–302.
  3. Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article2.cfm Bate, F. & Maor, D. (2010). TPACK and the real world: How useful is the framework?, Paper presented at the European Association for Practitioner Research on Improving Learning (EAPRIL) Conference 2010, Lisbon, Portugal, 24-26 November, 2010.
  4. Bate, F. (2010). A bridge too far? Explaining beginning teachers’ use of ICT in Australian schools. Australian Journal of Educational technology, 26 (7), 1042-1061.
  5. Bonk, C.J. & Zhang, K. (2008). Empowering Online Learning: 100+ activities for reading, reflecting, displaying and doing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Borthwick, A., Charles, M., Pierson, M., Thompson, A., Park, J., Searson, M. & Bull, G. (2008). Realizing Technology Potential through TPACK. Learning and Leading with Technology. Sept/Oct 08. 23-26.
  7. Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
  8. Dawson, K. (2007). The role of teacher inquiry in helping prospective teachers untangle the complexities of technology use in classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24 (1), 5-14.
  9. Dron, J. (2012), The Pedagogical-technological divide and the elephant in the room. International Journal on ELearning, 11:1, 23-38
  10. Duffy, T.M., & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Simon& Shuster Macmillan.Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Pedagogical
  11. Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers& Education 57 (2011) 1953–1960.
  12. Harris, J. & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C.D. Maddux, (Ed.). Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99-108). Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE). Harris, J., Grandgenett, N. & Hofer, M. (nd). Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric from www.activitytypes.wmwikis.net
  13. Harris, J.B. (2008). TPACK in in-service education: Assisting experienced teachers’ planned improvisations. In AACTE Committee on Innovation& Technology (Eds.). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (pp. 251-271). New York, NY: Routledge.
  14. Hechter, R. (2012). Pre-Service Teachers’ Maturing Perceptions of a TPACK-Framed Signature Pedagogy in Science Education, Computers in the Schools, 29:1-2, 53-69.
  15. Janessen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, ed. C.M. Reigeluth, Vol. II.215-39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  16. Johnson, L., Adams, S. & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  17. Kember, D. (2008). Digital world, digital pedagogies: Reframing the learning landscape. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), Canberra, Australia.
  18. Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). 60-70.
  19. Lawless, K., & Pellegrine, J. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knows, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
  20. Maor, D. & Roberts, P. (2011). Does the TPACK framework help to design a more engaging learning environment? In T. Bastiaens& M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 3498-3504). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  21. Maor, D. (2006). Using Reflective Diagrams in Professional Development with University Lecturers: A Developmental Tool in Online Teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 133-145.
  22. Maor, D. (2008). Changing relationship: who is the learner and who is the teacher in the online educational landscape? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (5), 627-638 http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/maor.pdf Maor, D., & Fraser, B. (1996). Use of Classroom Environment Perceptions in Evaluating Inquiry-Based Computer-Assisted Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 401-421.
  23. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108 (6). 1017–1054.
  24. Pierson, M. (2008). Teacher candidates reflect together on their own development of TPCK: Edited teaching videos as data for inquiry. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 5305-5309). Chesapeake, VA:
  25. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: MacMillan.
  26. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22. 30th ascilite Conference 2013 Proceedings Page 539
  27. Siemens, G. (2006) Connectivism: The changing nature of knowledge. Keynote address at the education.au Global eLearning Summit, Sydney, 2006. Retrieved by podcast at http://media.educationau.edu.au/gs06day1-am-siemens.mp3
  28. VonGlaserfeld, E. (1989) Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching, Synthese, 80, 121-140.Yaniv, H. (2008) S-AI-L: A Model for the Design of Simulated Learning Environments. Surfing the Internet 7, TelAviv, Israel, Mofet Institute. (Hebrew)
  29. Yaniv, H., Crichton S. (2008) S-AI-L: Simulated, Adventure Intelligent, Learning: An Instructional Design Mode, IASK: TL 2008, Aveiro, Portugal.
  30. Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A., Birinci, G. & Kurt, A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale, Computers& Education, 58, 964–977.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links