You are here:

Collaborative Learning in Online Study Groups: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective
ARTICLE

, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia ; , University of Belgrade, Australia

JITE-Research Volume 11, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

Educational benefits of online collaborative group work have been confirmed in numerous research studies. Most frequently cited advantages include the development of skills of critical thinking and problem solving as well as skills of self-reflection and co-construction of knowledge and meaning. However, the establishment and maintenance of active collaboration in online study groups is a challenging task, primarily due to students’ inability (e.g., owing to time constraints or lack of collaboration skills) or reluctance (e.g., due to the lack of or low participation of other group members) to participate actively in the group work. Aiming to better understand and contribute to the resolution of the problems of effective online group work, we followed a novel approach based on Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT). While EGT has been used extensively as a framework for studying the emergence and maintenance of cooperation in many disciplines, to the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been applied to understanding and facilitating group collaboration in online learning settings. In this paper, we present a study we have conducted in order to investigate whether, and to what extent, EGT can be applied to explain students’ participation in collaborative study groups.

Citation

Chiong, R. & Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative Learning in Online Study Groups: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 81-101. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aktipis, C.A. (2011). Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(4), 263-276.
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  3. Binmore, K. (2007). Does game theory work? The bargaining challenge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  4. Brindley, J.E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L.M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/675/1271 Chiong, R., Dhakal, S., & Jankovic, L. (2007). Effects of neighbourhood structure on evolution of cooperation in N-player iterated prisoner’s dilemma. In Yin, H., Tino, P., Corchado, E., Byrne, W., & Yao, X. (Eds.), Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (pp. 950-959). Lecture Notes in Computer
  5. Chiong, R., & Kirley, M. (2011). Iterated N-player games on small-world networks. In Krasnogor, N., & Lanzi, P.L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 1123-1130). New York: ACM Press.
  6. Cressman, R.. (2003). Evolutionary dynamics and extensive form games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  7. Ellis, A. (2001). Student-centred collaborative learning via face-to-face and asynchronous online communication: What's the difference? In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 169-177), Melbourne, Australia.
  8. Finegold, A., & Cooke, L. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 201-215.
  9. Gabriel, M. (2004). Learning together: Exploring group interactions online. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 54-72.
  10. Garrison, D.R., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of Inquiry Framework: Review, Issues, and Future Directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.
  11. Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132.
  12. Gill, T.G. (2008). A psychologically plausible goal-based utility function. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 11, 227-252.
  13. Gill, T.G., & Hicks, R.C. (2006). Task complexity and informing science: A synthesis. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9, 1-30.
  14. Gintis, H. (2000). Game theory evolving: A problem-centered introduction to modeling strategic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chiong & Jovanovic
  15. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R.T., & Fehr, E. (Eds.) (2005). Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  16. Helbing, D., & Yu, W. (2008). Migration as a mechanism to promote cooperation. Advances in Complex Systems, 11(4), 641-652.
  17. Helbing, D., & Yu, W. (2009). The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 3680-3685.
  18. Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Huxham, M., & Land, R. (2000). Assigning students in groupwork projects. Can we do better than random? Innovations in Education& Training International, 37(1), 17-22.
  20. Jiang, L.-L., Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Wang, B.-H. (2010). Role of adaptive migration in promoting cooperation in spatial games, Physical Review E, 81(3), 036108.
  21. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1985). The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups. In Slavin, R., et al. (Eds.), Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn (pp. 103-124), New York: Plenum.
  22. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  23. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1990). Cooperative classrooms. In Brubacher, M. (Ed.), Perspectives on Small Group Learning: Theory and Practice, Ontario, Canada: Rubican Publishing Ind.
  24. Jones, C., & Steeples, C. (2002). Perspectives and issues in networked learning. In Steeples, C., & Jones, C. (Eds.), Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. London: Springer-Verlag.
  25. Juwah, C. (2006). Interactions in online peer learning. In Sharma, R.C., & Juwah, C. (Eds.), Interactions in Online Education. Implications for Theory and Practice (pp. 171-190). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  26. Kagan, S. (1997). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
  27. Killingback, T., Bieri, J., & Flatt, T. (2006). Evolution in group-structured populations can resolve the tragedy of the commons. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 1477-1481.
  28. Killingback, T., & Doebeli, M. (1996). Spatial evolutionary game theory: Hawks and doves revisited. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 263, 1135-1144.
  29. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
  30. Lin, Y.-T., Yang, H.-X., Wu, Z.-X., & Wang, B.-H. (2011). Promotion of cooperation by aspirationinduced migration. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390, 77-82.
  31. Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G.R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15-18.
  33. McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page.
  34. Meister, J.C., & Willyerd, K. (2010). The 2020 workplace: How innovative companies attract, develop, and keep tomorrow’s employees today. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
  35. Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 115-122.
  36. Nowak, M.A., & May, R.M. (1992). Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature, 359, 826-829. 99 Collaborative Learning in Online Study Groups: An EGT Perspective
  37. Nowak, M.A., & May, R.M. (1993) The spatial dilemmas of evolution. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 3(1), 35-78.
  38. Nunney, L. (1985). Group selection, altruism, and structured-deme models. The American Naturalist, 126, 212-230.
  39. Oakley, B., Felder, R.M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2003). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-34.
  40. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
  41. Panitz, T. (1997). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: Comparing the two definitions helps understand the nature of interactive learning. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 8(2). Retrieved from: http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm
  42. Piezon, S., & Ferree, W. (2008). Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: A study of public university and U.S. Naval War College students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/484/1034 Rapoport, A., Guyer, M.J., & Gordon, D.G. (1976). The 2 x 2 game. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  43. Roberts, T.S., & McInnerney, J.M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology& Society, 10(4), 257-268.
  44. Sanders, M. (2008). A failure to collaborate. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(24). Retrieved from: http://wiki-blog-project.wiki.usfca.edu/file/view/A%2BFailure%2Bto%2BCollaborate.PDF Shaw, S. (2006). New reality: Workplace collaboration is crucial. Eedo Knowledgeware Whitepaper. Retrieved from: http://www.eclo.org/pages/uploads/File/NonECLO%20Publications/Workplace%20Collaboration%20is%20Crucial.pdf
  45. Sicardi, E.A., Fort, H., Vainstein, M.H., & Arenzon, J.J. (2009). Random mobility and spatial structure often enhance cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256, 240-246.
  46. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  47. Slavin, R.E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429-445.
  48. Smith, G.G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A.J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C.D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to groupwork: Online versus face-to-face. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 121-128.
  49. Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., & Donovan, S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51.
  50. Stacey, E. (1999). Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2). Retrieved from: http://web.mit.edu/acs/faq/Online-collaboration/collab-learning_files/stacey.htm
  51. Stodel, E., Thompson, T., & MacDonald, C. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3). Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/325/743 Tomassini, M. (2008). Games, evolution, and society. Rendiconti Del Seminario Matematico, 66(3), 229258.
  52. Traulsen, A., & Nowak, M.A. (2006). Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 10952-10955.
  53. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  54. Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77-90.
  55. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  56. Weibull, J.W. (1995). Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  57. Wilson, D.S. (1990). Weak altruism, strong group selection. Oikos, 59, 135-140.
  58. Wright, E.R., & Lawson, A.H. (2005). Computer mediated communication and student learning in large introductory sociology classes. Teaching Sociology, 33(2), 122-135.
  59. Yang, H.-X., Wu, Z.-X., & Wang, B.-H. (2010). Role of aspiration-induced migration in cooperation. Physical Review E, 81(6), 065101.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links