You are here:

Understanding the Factors Limiting the Acceptability of Online Courses and Degrees
Article

, FLorida State University, United States

International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This study examines prior research conducted on the acceptability of online degrees in hiring situations. In a national survey, a questionnaire was developed for assessing the importance of objections to accepting job candidates with online degrees and sent to university search committee chairs in institutions advertising open faculty positions (which normally require a doctoral degree). Qualitative statements regarding such objections were drawn from four national surveys and arranged into a paired-comparison questionnaire. Based on the Law of Comparative Judgment, an index was developed from a statistical analysis based on the responses of 123 university and college administrators (chairpersons, department heads, and deans). The findings revealed that objections concerned three issues: (a) face-to-face classroom experience, (b) reputation of institution for rigor, and (c) mentored learning experiences are the stumbling blocks for online degrees to be perceived as being as acceptable as traditional degrees. These findings may provide an important perspective on the difficult issue of how to design new approaches to distance education that will improve the acceptability of course and degree offerings.

Citation

Adams, J. (2008). Understanding the Factors Limiting the Acceptability of Online Courses and Degrees. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 573-587. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 29, 2023 from .

© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adams, J. (2006, May). The part played by instructional media in distance education. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 6(2). Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.utpjou Rnals.com/simile/
  2. Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2005). The acceptability of a doctoral degree earned online as a credential for obtaining a faculty position. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 71-85.
  3. Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2006). The acceptability of online degrees as a credential for obtaining professional employment. Communication Education, 55(1), 32-45.
  4. Adams, J. DeFleur, M. & Heald, G. (2007). The acceptability of online degrees in health hiring professions. Communication Education, 56(3), 292-307.
  5. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005) Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005. Report sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation ( www.sloan-C.org ; 2006, May 19). The Chronicle Index of For-Profit Higher Education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(37), A30.
  6. Bears, J., & Bears, M. (2006). Bears’ guide. Retrieved October 2, 2006, from http://www.degree .net/books/bearsguide.htm
  7. Blumenstyk, G. (2003, September 5). Companies' graduate programs challenge colleges of
  8. Blumenstyk, G. (2005, January 7). For-profit education: Online courses fuel growth. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(18), A11.
  9. Carnevale, D. (2005). Offering entire degrees online is one key to distance education, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(22), A31. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v51/i22/22a03101.htm
  10. Carnevale, D., & Olsen, F. (2003). How to succeed in distance education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(40), A31. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i44/44a02501.htm
  11. Carr, S. (2000, February 11). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23). Retrieved April 23, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v46/i23/23a00101.htm
  12. Cobb, T. (1997). Cognitive efficiency: Toward a revised theory of media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 21-35.
  13. DeFleur, M., & Adams, J. (2004). Acceptability of online bachelor's degrees as criteria for admission to graduate programs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 150-161. Delialioglu, O. (2005, October) Investigation of source of motivation in a hybrid course. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference, Chicago, IL.
  14. Diaz, D. (2002, May/June). Online dropout rates revisited. The Technology Source. Retrieved April 23, 2006, from http://technologysource.org/article/online_drop_rates_revisited/
  15. Dyrud, M. (2000) The third wave: A position paper. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 93-103.
  16. Jensen, M. (2001, September 14). Academic press gives away its secret of success. The
  17. Gagne, M., & Shapherd, M. (2001). A comparison between a distance and a traditional
  18. Guernsey, L. (1998, March 27). Colleges debate the wisdom of having on-campus students
  19. Hauser, W., & Bailey, T. (2006). Projection of education statistics to 2014 (34th Ed.). National Center for Education Statistics, Report No. NCES 2006-084, 14.
  20. Lilja, D. (2001) Comparing instructional delivery methods for teaching computer systems performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(1), 35-40.
  21. MacFarland, T. (1999, February). Fall term 1999 Nova Southeastern University students respond to a broad-based satisfaction survey: A comparison of campus-based students and distance
  22. Miettinen, M., Nokelainen, P., Kurhila, J., Silander, T., & Tirri, H. (2005). EDUFORM – A tool for creating adaptive questionnaires. International Journal of E-Learning, 4(3), 365-373.
  23. Pappert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books. Persin, R. (2002). Web-assisted instruction in physics: An enhancement to block scheduling. American Secondary Education, 30(3), 61-69.
  24. Pulley, J. (2005, May 5). Capella university prepares to go public. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(35), A30.
  25. Russell, T. (1999). The ‘no significant difference’ phenomenon. Retreived November 12, 2004, from http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/
  26. Sikora, A. (2003) A profile of participation in distance education: 1999-2000. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. National Center for Education Statistics. NCES 2003017. Berkeley, CA: MPR Associates.
  27. Tuckman, B. (2002), Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers & Education, 39, 261-269.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.