Economies of scope in distance education: The case of Chinese research universities
ARTICLE
Fengliang Li, Xinlei Chen, Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PR China
IRRODL Volume 13, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
With the rapid development of information technologies, distance education has become “another form of product differentiation in the output mix produced by the multi-product university or college” (Cohn & Cooper, 2004, p. 607). This article aims at analyzing the economies of scope of distance education (as an educational output) in Chinese research universities. The empirical results show that a) product-specific economies of scope do exist in distance education programs offered by Chinese research universities; b) there are economies of scale in distance education; and c) there are weak cost complementarities between distance education and research output, meaning that distance education and academic research can promote each other to reduce the costs in Chinese research universities.
Citation
Li, F. & Chen, X. (2012). Economies of scope in distance education: The case of Chinese research universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 117-131. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/49708/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Abrioux, D., & Ferreira, F (2009). Perspectives on distance education: Open schooling in the 21st Century. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
- Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C., & Willig, R.D.(1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Cesar C.R. (2006). Estimating the degree cost functions of the Philippines public and private higher educational institutions. AsiaPacific Education Review, 7(1), 32-40.
- Cohn, E., & Cooper, S.T. (2004). Mulit-product cost functions for universities: Economies of scale and scope. In G. Johnes & J. Johnes (Eds.), The International handbook on the economics of education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Cohn, E., Rhine, S.L.W., & Santos, M.C.(1989). Institutions of higher education as multiproduct firms: Economies of scale and scope. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 284-290.
- Curran, C. (2008). Online learning and the university. In W.J. Bramble & S.K. Panda (Eds.) Economics of distance and online learning: Theory, practice, and research. New York: Routledge.
- De Groot, H., McMahon, W.W., & Volkwein, J.F.(1991). The cost structure of American research universities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 424-431.
- Ding, X.F. (2001) The research in distance education (in Chinese). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
- Dundar, H., & Lewis, D.R. (1995). Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 199-244.
- Glass, J.C., McKillop, D.G., & Hyndman, N.S.(1995) The achievement of scale efficiency in UK universities: A multiple-input multiple-output analysis. Education Economics, 3(3), 249-263.
- Hashimoto, K., & Cohn, E. (1997). Economies of scale and scope in Japanese private universities. Education Economics, 5(2),107-115.
- Hou L., Li F., & Min W.(2009). Multiproduct total cost functions for higher education: The case of Chinese research universities. Economics of Education Review, 29(4),374– 381.
- Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R., & Crouchley, R.(2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: The case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 63-71.
- Johnes, G. (1996). Multi-product cost functions and the funding of tuition in UK Universities. Applied Economics Letters, 3(9), 557-561.
- Johnes, G. (1997). Costs and industrial structure in contemporary British higher education. Economic Journal, 107(442), 727-37
- Johnes, G., Johnes, J., & Thanassoulis, E.(2008). An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 527-549.
- Koshal, R.K., & Koshal, M. (2000). Do liberal arts colleges exhibit economies of scale and scope? Education Economics, 8(3), 209-220.
- Koshal, R.K., Koshal, M., & Gupta, A. (2001). Multi-product total cost function for higher education: A Case of Bible colleges. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 297303.
- Laband, D.N., & Lentz, B.F. (2003). New estimates of economies of scale and scope in higher education. Southern Economic Journal, 70(1), 172-183.
- Lewis, D.R., & Dundar, H. (1995). Economics of scale and scope in Turkish universities. Education Economics, 3(2), 133-157.
- MOE (2009). The notice of Ministry of Education on the enrollment in distance higher education for degree programmes (in Chinese). Beijing: Department of Higher Education, MOE).
- Morris, D. (2008). Economies of scale and scope in e-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 331-343.
- Nelson, R., & Hevert, K.T. (1992). Effect of class size on economies of scale and marginal costs in higher education. Applied Economics, 24(5), 473-482.
- Randy, D.G., & Anderson D.T. (1999). Avoiding the industrialization of research universities: Big and little distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 48-63.
- Rumble, G. (1976). The economics of the Open University. Milton Keynes: OU.
- Rumble, G. (1997). The costs and economics of open and distance learning. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Sav, G.T.(2004). Higher education costs and scale and scope economies. Applied Economics, 36(6), 607–614
- Siaciwena, R. (2008). Distance education/learning. In G. McCulloch& D. Crook (Eds.) The Routledge international encyclopedia of education. New York: Routledge. Stevens, P.A.(2005). A stochastic frontier analysis of English and Welsh universities. Education Economics, 13(4),355-374.
- Wagner, L. (1972). The economics of the Open University. Higher Education, 1(2), 150-83. 131 Economies of Scope in Distance Education: The Case of Chinese Research Universities Li and ChenVol 13 | No 3 Research Articles June 2012
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References