The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material
ARTICLE
Catherine McLoughlin
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 15, Number 3, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Abstract
An enduring question for educational research is the effect of individual differences on the efficacy of learning. Aspects of individual differences that have been much explored relate to differences in learning styles, strategies and conceptions of learning. Such differences present a profound challenge for instructional designers, as research has shown that the quality of learning material is enhanced if the material is designed to take into account learners' individual learning styles (Rasmussen, 1998; Riding & Grimley, 1999). In the context of the present research, learning style is taken to mean a consistent or habitual of mode of acquiring or imparting knowledge through study, experience or teaching (Beishuizen & Stoutjesdijk, 1999). The purpose of this article is to propose ways in which individual differences can be accommodated when designing self-instructional learning materials in print for distance learners. It is advocated that instructional designers turn to research on learning styles to inform the design of adaptive learning material. Kolb's (1984) learning cycle and associated learning styles are described with a view to providing instructional design guidelines which accommodate (i) each stage of the learning cycle (ii) individual differences between learners in processing and presenting information. Examples of learning activities for each stage of the learning cycle are provided from a tertiary bridging course for adult learners. It is recommended that in designing for a diverse student body, the research literature on learning styles can provide insights that have the potential to improve instructional design.
Citation
McLoughlin, C. & McLoughlin, C. (1999). The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3),. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44600/.
References
View References & Citations Map- Allinson, J., & Hayes, C. (1994). Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice. British Journal of Management, 5, 53-71.
- Allinson, C.W., & Hayes, J. (1988). The learning styles questionnaire: An alternative to Kolb's inventory? Journal of Management Studies, 25, 269-281.
- Anderson, B., & McMillan, M. (1992). Learning experiences for professional reality and responsibility. In J. Mulligan& C. Griffin (Eds.), Empowerment through experiential learning (pp. 222-232). London: Kogan Page.
- Atkinson, S. (1998). Cognitive style in the context of design and technology work. Educational Psychology, 18(2), 183-194.
- Beishuizen, J.J., & Stoutjesdijk, E.T. (1999). Study strategies in a computer assisted study environment. Learning and Instruction, 9(3), 281-301.
- Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. New York: Plenum.
- Biggs, J.B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(381-394).
- Biggs, J.B., & Moore, P.J. (1993). The process of learning (3rd Edition ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
- Busato, V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). Learning styles: Across sectional and longitudinal study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 427-441.
- Claxton, C., & Murrell, P. (1987). Learning styles: Implications for improving educational practices (Report no. 4). Texas: ASHE-ERIC.
- Cleminson, K., Putnam, K., & Bradford, S. (1994). Effects of learning styles and context on work-based learning. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning (pp. 359-371). Oxford: Oxonian Rewley Press.
- Collis, B. (1998). Flexible learning and the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 29(1), 59-72.
- Curry, L. (1991). Patterns of learning style across selected medical specialties. Educational Psychology, 11, 247-278.
- Cyrs, T. (1997). Visual thinking: Let them see what you are saying. New directions McLoughlin 239
- Davidson, G.V., & Savenye, W.S. (1992). How do learning styles relate to performance in a computer applications course? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(1), 348-358.
- Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into higher education. London: HMSO & NCIHE.
- Ellis, A.E. (1996). Learning styles and hypermedia courseware design. In P. Carlson& F. Makedon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (Vol. 2, pp. 354-359). Charlottesville,
- Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching. New York: John Wiley.
- Entwistle, N.J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Crumb Helm.
- Evans, B., & Honour, L. (1997). Getting inside knowledge: The application of Entwistles's model of surface-deep processing in producing open learning materials. Educational Psychology, 17(1), 127-139.
- Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Orlando, FL.: Harcourt, Brace, Janovich.
- Grigerenko, E.L., & Sternberg, R.J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D.H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205230). New York: Plenum Press.
- Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.
- Honebein, P.C., Duffy, T.M., & Fishman, B.J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D.H. Jonassen, & T.M. Welsh (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 87-107). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Jeung, H.-J., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329-344.
- Jonassen, D. (1988). Integrating learning strategies into courseware to facilitate deeper processing. In D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 151-182). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Jonassen, D.H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 20(1), 1-8.
- Keefe, J.W., & Monk, J.S. (1986). Learning styles profile. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
- Knapper, C.K. (1995). Understanding student learning: Implications for instructional practice. In W.A. Wright (Ed.), Teaching improvement practices. Bolton. MA: Anker Publishing Company. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 1999, 15(3)
- Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
- Kolb, D.A., Osland, J.S., & Rubin, I.W. (1995). Organisational Behaviour: An experiential approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
- Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-48.
- Matthews, D.B. (1991). The effects of learning styles on grades of first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 32(3), 253-268.
- Morgan, C.K., & Tam, M. (1999). Unravelling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Distance Education, 20(1), 96-108.
- Mulligan, J., & Griffin, C. (1992). Empowerment through experiential learning. London: Kogan Page.
- Munro, J. (1998). The effect of cognitive style on learning to write a letter of complaint. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 243-254.
- Murray-Harvey, R. (1994). Learning styles and approaches to learning: Distinguishing between concepts and instruments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 373-388.
- Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience of higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Rasmussen, K.L. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291-308.
- Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1), 5-27.
- Richardson, J.T.E. (1994). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education. Higher Education, 27, 449-468.
- Riding, R.J. (1991). Cognitive styles analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.
- Riding, R., & Grimley, M. (1999). Cognitive style and learning from multimedia materials in 11-year children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 4359.
- Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3 & 4), 193-215.
- Riding, R., & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, McLoughlin 241
- Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton Publishers.
- Riding, R.J. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17(2), 29-49.
- Riding, R.J., & Rayner, S. (1995). The information superhighway and individualised learning. Educational Psychology, 15(4), 365-378.
- Ross, J. (1999). Can computer-aided instruction accommodate all learners equally? British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 5-24.
- Rowntree, D. (1992). Exploring open and distance learning materials. London: Kogan Page.
- Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). 'Learning style': Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17(1), 51-63.
- Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skills may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(6), 623-627.
- Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Learning styles and instructional design. Innovations in Education and Training International, 33(4), 185-193.
- Seden, M.R. (1994). Course design and student learning. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning (pp. 371-378). Oxford: Oxonian Rewley Press.
- Schmeck, R.R. (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
- Simons, P.R.J. (1992). Theories and principles of learning to learn. In A. Tuijman (Eds.), Learning across the lifespan (pp. 159-171). London: Pergamon Press.
- Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
- Watkins, D. (1982). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian University students. Australian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 76-85.
- Watkins, D. (1998). Assessing approaches to learning. In B. Dart & G. BoultonLewis (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Melbourne: ACER.
- Witkin, H.A., Ottman, P.K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S.A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R., & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Multimedia based enhancement of the science of oenology in the distance education learning environment
Paul Bowyer, Christopher Blanchard & Christopher Blanchard
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 19, No. 3 (Jan 01, 2003)
-
Assessing the Effect of Instructional Video Design on Students’ Learning Outcome in an Online Technology Integration Course
Mohamed Ibrahim, Rebecca Callaway & David Bell, Arkansas Tech University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 349–356
-
The Impact of Digital Tools on Middle School Science Literacy
Randy Yerrick & Joseph Johnson, SUNY, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 9, No. 3 (September 2009) pp. 280–315
-
Digital Text Presentation for Learning
Miriam Schcolnik & Sara Kol, Tel Aviv University, Israel
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 1042–1049
-
Whose standards?: Asking students to generate the marking key in a multimedia unit
Barnard Clarkson & Chris Brook, edith cowan university, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2003 (2003) pp. 2074–2081
-
Applications of Adaptive Technologies in Online Learning
Fethi Ahmet Inan & Michael M. Grant, University of Memphis, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (2004) pp. 2701–2706
-
Multiple perspectives on the evaluation of online discussion
Catherine McLoughlin, Australian Catholic University, Australia; Mary Panko, UNITEC, New Zealand
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2002 (2002) pp. 1281–1286
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.