
Technology Adoption and Academic Development
PROCEEDINGS
Heather Kanuka, Nathasja Saranchuk, University of Alberta, Canada
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-90-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
Abstract
The growing demands and needs to assist teaching staff in institutions of higher education with the adoption of new and emerging technologies is being propelled from several directions. But innovative teaching initiatives, intended to help university instructors better leverage technology, are not without tensions. To gain a better understanding of these tensions, we interviewed directors of teaching development centres in Canada, United States, Australia, and the UK. The results of this study indicate that there is a tension between what teaching centres are doing and what they would like to be doing with respect to the integration of technology into teaching practices. The following themes emerged from this study: uncertainty about how best to leverage technology, questions regarding a teaching development centre’s role in being strategic, and the need for scalability. In this presentation we will provide a broad discussion of the findings and implications for academic development for technology adoption.
Citation
Kanuka, H. & Saranchuk, N. (2011). Technology Adoption and Academic Development. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2011--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 228-230). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 28, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/38703/.
© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Irani, T., & Telg, R. (2002). Building it so they will come: Assessing universities’ distance education faculty training and development programs. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1). Retrieved May 27, 2007 from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol17.1/irani.html
- Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 319-339.
- Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
- Lockwood, F. (2002). Leadership, disruptive technologies, lessons learned and changes in learning and teaching. Open Learning, 17(3), 199-202.
- Ludwig, M., & Taymans, J. (2005). Teaming: Constructing high-quality faculty development in a PT3 project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 357-372.
- Padgett, D.L., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). Designing a faculty development program on technology: If you build it, will they come? Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 325-334.
- Powell, R.J., & Keen, C. (2006). The axiomatic trap: Stultifying myths in distance education. Higher Education, 52, 283-301.
- Taylor, J.A. (2003). Managing staff development for online education: A situated learning model. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 75-87.
- Viskovic, A. (2006). Becoming a tertiary teacher: learning in communities of practice. Higher Education Research& Development, 25(4), 323-339.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References