You are here:

The spillover benefits of expanding access to preschool
ARTICLE

, University of South Carolina, United States

Economics of Education Review Volume 70, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

I ask do spillover benefits exist from preschool. I exploit district and time variation in access to a state preschool program (CDEP) that targets disadvantaged four-year-olds (those eligible for free or reduced-price lunch or Medicaid). Using a difference-indifferences design, I estimate the effects by CDEP-eligibility status of CDEP exposure (residing in a CDEP district after launch at age four) on test scores. I find that CDEP benefits its targeted population and increases the math and reading scores of exposed, CDEP-ineligible students by about 0.13 and 0.14 standard deviations, respectively. These spillover effects may stem, in whole or in part, from improvements to classroom decorum via fewer behavioral disruptions.

Citation

Williams, B.J. (2019). The spillover benefits of expanding access to preschool. Economics of Education Review, 70(1), 127-143. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved December 5, 2023 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on June 3, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.04.002

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Andrews, R.J., Jargowsky, P., & Kuhne, K. (2012). The effects of Texas’s targeted pre-kindergarten program on academic performance.
  2. Beaman, R., Wheldall, K., & Kemp, C. (2006). Differential teacher attention to boys and girls in the classroom. Educational Review, 58(3), pp. 339-366.
  3. Carrell, S.E., & Hoekstra, M.L. (2010). Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1).
  4. Cascio, E.U., & Schanzenbach, D.W. (2013). The impacts of expanding access to high-quality preschool education.
  5. Dodge, K.A., Bai, Y., Ladd, H.F., & Muschkin, C.G. (2017). Impact of North Carolina’s early childhood programs and policies on educational outcomes in elementary school. Child Development, 88(3), pp. 996-1014.
  6. Doyle, O., Harmon, C.P., Heckman, J.J., & Tremblay, R.E. (2009). Investing in early human development: Timing and economic efficiency. Economics & Human Biology, 7(1), pp. 1-6.
  7. Elango, S., García, J.L., Heckman, J.J., & Hojman, A. (2015). Early childhood education.
  8. Feller, A., Grindal, T., Miratrix, L., & Page, L.C. (2016). Compared to what? Variation in the impacts of early childhood education by alternative care type. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 10(3), pp. 1245-1285.
  9. Figlio, D.N. (2007). Boys named Sue: Disruptive children and their peers. Education Finance and Policy, 2(4), pp. 376-394.
  10. Fitzpatrick, M.D. (2008). Starting school at four: The effect of universal pre-kindergarten on children’s academic achievement. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1).
  11. Gormley, W.T., & Gayer, T. (2005). Promoting school readiness in Oklahoma an evaluation of Tulsa’s pre-k program. Journal of Human Resources, 40(3), pp. 533-558.
  12. Gormley Jr, W.T., Gayer, T., Phillips, D., & Dawson, B. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development.. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), p. 872.
  13. Heckman, J., Moon, S.H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P., & Yavitz, A. (2010). Analyzing social experiments as implemented: A reexamination of the evidence from the HighScope Perry Preschool Program. Quantitative Economics, 1(1), pp. 1-46.
  14. Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103(6).
  15. Heckman, J.J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), pp. 1900-1902.
  16. Kline, P., & Walters, C.R. (2016). Evaluating public programs with close substitutes: The case of Head Start. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), pp. 1795-1848.
  17. Ladd, H.F., Muschkin, C.G., & Dodge, K.A. (2014). From birth to school: Early childhood initiatives and third-grade outcomes in North Carolina. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), pp. 162-187.
  18. Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D.W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), pp. 1-26.
  19. Lefgren, L. (2004). Educational peer effects and the Chicago public schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(2), pp. 169-191.
  20. Lin, X. (2010). Identifying peer effects in student academic achievement by spatial autoregressive models with group unobservables. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), pp. 825-860.
  21. Lipsey, M.W., Hofer, K.G., Dong, N., Farran, D.C., & Bilbrey, C. (2013). Evaluation of the Tennessee voluntary prekindergarten program: Kindergarten and first grade follow-up results from the randomized control design.
  22. Loeb, S., Bridges, M., Bassok, D., Fuller, B., & Rumberger, R.W. (2007). How much is too much? The influence of preschool centers on children’s social and cognitive development. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), pp. 52-66.
  23. Magnuson, K.A., Meyers, M.K., Ruhm, C.J., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), pp. 115-157.
  24. Magnuson, K.A., Ruhm, C., & Waldfogel, J. (2007). Does prekindergarten improve school preparation and performance?. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), pp. 33-51.
  25. Neidell, M., & Waldfogel, J. (2010). Cognitive and noncognitive peer effects in early education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), pp. 562-576.
  26. Puma, M., Bell, S., Cook, R., Heid, C., Broene, P., & Jenkins, F. (2012). Third grade follow-up to the head start impact study: final report.
  27. Reardon, S.F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. Whither Opportunity, pp. 91-116.
  28. Schanzenbach, D. W. (2014). Does class size matter?,.
  29. Skiba, R.J., Michael, R.S., Nardo, A.C., & Peterson, R.L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), pp. 317-342.
  30. Weiland, C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2013). Impacts of a prekindergarten program on children’s mathematics, language, literacy, executive function, and emotional skills. Child Development, 84(6), pp. 2112-2130.
  31. Wong, A. (2015). Should the Presidential Candidates Be Focusing More on Pre-K? TheAtlantic.com [Online; posted 23-October-2015].
  32. Zhai, F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2014). Head Starts impact is contingent on alternative type of care in comparison group.. Developmental Psychology, 50(12), p. 2572.
  33. Zimmerman, D.J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), pp. 9-23.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References