You are here:

Virtual Representations in 3D Learning Environments
ARTICLE

,

IJELLO Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Abstract

Citation

Shonfeld, M. & Kritz, M. (2013). Virtual Representations in 3D Learning Environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 9(1), 249-266. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved May 29, 2023 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abram, S. (2007). At Second Life, info pros will find much to see, do, learn, play with, try out. Information Outlook, 11(4), 34-36.
  2. Bailenson, J.N., Swinth, K.R., & Hoyt, C.L. (2005). The independent and interactive effects of embodied agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 379-393.
  3. Barret, J.L. (1997). Anthropomorphism, intentional agents, and conceptualizing god. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.
  4. Boulos, M.N.K., Hetherington, L., & Wheeler, S. (2007). Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information& Libraries Journal, 24, 233– 245.
  5. Brahnam, S. (2009). Building character for artificial conversational agents: Ethos, ethics, believability, and credibility. PsychNology Journal, 7(1), 9-47.
  6. Shonfeld& KritzBreazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 119-155.
  7. Campbell, C. (2009). Learning in a different life: Pre-service education students using an online virtual world. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 2(1).
  8. Carmi, G. (2008). Lemida besviva metuksheret kemetayevet netiot hashiva intelektualiot[Learning in an communicated environment as enhancing of intellectual thinking attitude]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
  9. Carmi, G., & Man, A. (2012). Sifriot Baolam Havirtuali “Second Life”: Skirat Hitpathut ve Teur Peilut [Libraries at the virtual world “Second Life”]. Meidaat, 8, 17-32.
  10. DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003). From seduction to fulfillment: The use of anthropomorphic form in design. Paper presented at the 2003 International conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  11. Falloon, G. (2010). Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 108–122.
  12. Galanxhi, H., & Nah, F.F. (2007). Deception in cyberspace: A comparison of text-only vs. Avatarsupported medium. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 65(9), 770-783.
  13. Garau, M., Slater, M., & Vinayagamoorthy, V. (2003). The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. Paper presented at the CHI’03-The conference on human factors in computing systems, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
  14. Hamilton, M.A., & Nowak, K.L. (2010). Advancing a model of avatar evaluation and selection. PsychNology Journal, 8(1), 33 – 65.
  15. Hoter, E., Shonfeld, M., & Ganayem, A. (2009). ICT in the service of multiculturalism. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2). Retrieved October 30, 2013, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/601/1207
  16. Jennings, N., & Collins, C. (2007). Virtual or virtually U: Educational institutions in Second Life. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 180–186.
  17. Kolko, B.E. (1999). Representing bodies in virtual space: The rhetoric of avatar design. The Information Society 15(3), 177-186.
  18. Martey, R.M., & Consalvo, M. (2011). Performing the looking-glass self: Avatar appearance and group identity in Second Life. Popular Communication, 9(3), 165-180.
  19. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81.
  20. Nowak, K.L., Hamilton, M.A., & Hammond, C.C. (2009). The effect of image features on judgments of homophily, credibility, and intention to use as avatars in future interactions. Media Psychology, 12, 5076.
  21. Nowak, K.L., & Rauh, C. (2008). Examining the perception process of avatar anthropomorphism, credibility and androgyny in static and chat context. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1473-1493.
  22. Peña, G., McGlone, M.S., & Sanchez, J. (2012). The cowl makes the monk: How avatar appearance and role labels affect cognition in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 5(3).
  23. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  24. Resta, P. & Shonfeld, M. (2013). A study of trans-national learning teams in a virtual world. In R. McBride& M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 2932-2940). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved December 2, 2013
  25. Shonfeld, M., Resta, P., & Yaniv, H. (2011). Engagement and social presence in a virtual worlds (Second Life) learning environment. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information
  26. Taylor, T.L. (2002). Living digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars, presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 40-62). London: SpringerVerlag.
  27. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J.N. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References