The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL
Pieter J. Beers, Henny P.A. Boshuizen, Paul A. Kirschner, Wim H. Gijselaers
Learning and Instruction Volume 17, Number 4, ISSN 0959-4752 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
CSCL research has given rise to a plethora of analysis methods, all with specific analysis goals, units of analysis, and for specific types of data (chat, threaded discussions, etc.). This article describes some challenges of CSCL-analysis. The development of an analysis method for negotiation processes in multidisciplinary teams serves as an example of how these challenges occur in practice. Results reveal a number of tensions with regard to establishing reliable coding procedures without compromising validity, such as how to define codes, and rules for applying codes. The discussion offers some guidelines for content analysis of CSCL-data.
Beers, P.J., Boshuizen, H.P.A., Kirschner, P.A. & Gijselaers, W.H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 427-435. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved March 22, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/100691/.
This record was imported from Learning and Instruction on January 29, 2019. Learning and Instruction is a publication of Elsevier.Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.002
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Modeling Grounding Processes in Chat-based CSCL
Michael Oehl, Theodor Berwe, Mathias Wahl & Hans-Ruediger Pfister, Leuphana University of Lueneburg, Germany
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010 (Jun 29, 2010) pp. 3774–3779
Discourse Analyses in Chat-based CSCL with Learning Protocols: Effects of Different Scripting Strategies
Michael Oehl, Mathias Wahl, Theodor Berwe & Hans-Ruediger Pfister, Leuphana University of Lueneburg, Germany
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010 (Jun 29, 2010) pp. 1555–1560
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.