You are here:

Collaborative Evaluation of Teaching for E-Learning
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , The George Washington University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Phoenix, Arizona, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-50-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Evaluation of teaching is an effective strategy to improve teaching. Online evaluation of teachers has not received appropriate attention as a tool to improve teaching in various levels of education and for evaluation of performance in higher education teaching for consideration of promotion and tenure. Both peer evaluation of teaching and student evaluation have strengths and weaknesses. This study proposes the integration of peer evaluation, self-evaluation, and student evaluation for online instructors. Evaluations by peers and students are reported. Instructors and students expressed positive responses to this integrated evaluation of online teaching although it is a time-consuming process.

Citation

Tu, C.H., Yen, C.J., Corry, M. & Ianacone, R. (2003). Collaborative Evaluation of Teaching for E-Learning. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2003--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 325-330). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2023 from .

© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Burns, C.W. (1998). Peer Evaluation of Teaching: Claims vs. Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED421470)
  2. Centra, J.A. (1987). Formative and summative evaluation: Parody or paradox? Techniques for evaluating and improving instruction. L.M. Aleamoni (Ed.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 31 (pp. 4755).
  3. Gould, C. (1991). Converting Faculty Assessment into Faculty Development: The Director of Composition's Responsibility to Probationary Faculty. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED331068)
  4. Haugen, L. (1998). Writing a Teaching Philosophy Statement. Retrieved March 3, 2003 from Center for Teaching Excellence, Iowa State University. Website: http://www.cte.iastate.edu/tips/philosophy.html
  5. Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects. Innovative Higher Education, 20 (4), 221-234.
  6. Keig, L.W., & Waggoner, M.D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED378925)
  7. Keig, L.W., & Waggoner, M.D. (1995). Peer review of teaching: Improving college instruction through formative assessment. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6 (3), 51-83.
  8. Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 253-388.
  9. Osborne, J.L. (1998). Integrating student and peer evaluation teaching. College Teaching, 46(1), 36-38.
  10. Seldin, P. (1993). Successful use of teaching portfolios. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  11. Tu, C.H., & Corry, M. (2003). Designs, managements, and strategies in asynchronous learning discussions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 303-315.
  12. Tu, C.H., Yen, C.J., Corry, M., & Ianacone, R. (2003). Integrating Peer evaluation of teaching and student evaluation for online instruction. In G. Mark(Ed.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. Vo l. 2003, Issue. 1 (pp. 535-540). Norfolk, VA: Association for the

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read