The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses
Lawrence Tomei, Robert Morris University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 14, Number 3, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
This study examined the impact of substituting didactic instruction, face-to-face advisement, and conventional evaluation with distance-based delivery of content, electronic counseling, and online assessment. It analyzed the impact of distance learning demands on faculty teaching loads and computed the ideal class size for an online course. Specifically, this article sought answers to the following questions. 1. What are the teaching demands of an online course? 2. What is the impact of distance learning demands on faculty teaching loads? Does teaching at a distance require more or less of an instructor's time? 3. What is the ideal class size for an online course versus the traditional classroom? The research reflected in this study found that online teaching demanded a minimum of 14% more time than traditional instruction, most of which was spent presenting instructional content. The weekly impact on teaching load also varied considerably between the two formats. Traditional teaching was more stable across the semester while online teaching fluctuated greatly during periods of advisement and assessment. Finally, the ideal class size was calculated for both instructional formats.
Tomei, L. (2006). The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 531-541. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.
© 2006 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Rebecca Van de Vord & Korolyn Pogue, Center for Distance and Professional Education, Washington State University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 22, 2012) pp. 132–146
Bruce Doney, Mercer University, United States; Karen McFerrin, Northwestern State University, United States; Elaine Artman, Mercer University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 237–240
Craig Scanlan, UMDNJ, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (Oct 26, 2009) pp. 1927–1932
An Investigation of Teaching and Learning: Using Course Management Software (CMS) in a Typically Face to Face Course
Marcia Burrell-Ihlow, State University of New York College at Oswego, United States
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 8, No. 1 (January 2009) pp. 5–16
Seugnet Blignaut, North-West University, South Africa; Lynette Nagel, University of Pretoria, South Africa
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (Oct 15, 2007) pp. 657–665
Qi Wang, Gallaudet University, United States; Mark Harris, Nova Southeastern University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2005 (2005) pp. 651–656
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.