You are here:

Improving Collaborative Online Learning Using the TEC Model
PROCEEDINGS

, Kibbutzim College of Education & Mofet Institute, Israel ; , Talpiot College of Education & Mofet Institute, Israel ; , Mofet Institute & Al-Qasemi College of Education, Israel

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The current study investigates changes in groups cohesion and collaboration in an online environment using the TEC (Trust building in an Online Collaborative Environment) model (Hoter, Shonfeld & Ganayem, 2009; 2012). The TOCE model provides a template for gradual contact and collaboration in small heterogeneous groups in online environments. Data was collected from a one year online college course which included students from 8 different teacher education colleges representing different cultural groups in Israel (Arabs and Jews). The course used both synchronous and a-synchronous platforms and the assignments were carried out in small multicultural groups. Results show significant improvement in cohesiveness and collaboration within the small work groups.

Citation

Shonfeld, M., Hoter, E. & Ganayem, A. (2013). Improving Collaborative Online Learning Using the TEC Model. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1028-1033). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Dewey, J. (1916), Democracy and Education: an introduction to the philosophy of education, NewYork, Macmillan
  2. Dailey R.C. (1977). The Effects of Cohesiveness and Collaboration on Work Groups: A Theoretical Model. Group Organization Management vol. 2 no. 4, 461-469
  3. Evans C.R., & Jarvis, P.A. (1986) The group attitude scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17, 203-216.
  4. Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). Retrieved March 16, 2004 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/jarvenpaa.html
  5. Gerdy, K. (1998). If Socrates only knew: expanding law class discourse. CALI Conference on Law School Computing, Chicago, Illinois. Jehn, K., Northcraft, G. & Neale, M. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741763.
  6. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F.P. (2012). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. NJ, US: Prentice-Hall
  7. Ministry of Education. (2011). Adapting the Educational System to the 21st Century. Retrieved October 1st, 2011 from: http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/MadaTech/englishsifria/AdaptingtheEducationSystemtothe21Century/Vision_and_rationale.htm
  8. Hoter, E., Shonfeld, M., & Ganayem, A. (2009). ICT in the service of multiculturalism. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 10(2). Retrieved April 30, 2009, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/601/1207
  9. Piper, W.E., Marrache, M., Lacrois, R., Richardson, A.M., & Jones, B.D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93-108.
  10. Resta, P., Carroll, T. (2010). Redefining Teacher Education for Digital-Age Learners: A Call to Action, The Summary Report of the Invitational Summit on Redefining Teacher Education for DigitalAge Learners. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin Learning Technology Center.
  11. Seashore, S.E. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial workgroup. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Institute for Social Research
  12. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65).
  13. Wang, Z., Walther, J.B. And Hancock, J.T. (2009), Social Identification and Interpersonal Communication in Computer-Mediated Communication: What You Do Versus Who You Are in Virtual Groups. Human Communication Research, 35: 59–85

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.