You are here:

From Theory into Practice: Weaving Teaching Presence into E-Learning Design
PROCEEDINGS

, Fort Hays State University, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Denver, Colorado, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-95-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract: Corresponding to the national trend of growth in online enrollments as reported in the Sloan-C annual survey report on online education, this specific institution has grown rapidly in online enrollments. To prepare faculty for course design and online teaching, the university has provided faculty with five online training modules that are designed based on the community of inquiry framework. This brief paper first introduces the community of inquiry framework, and then analyzes the teaching presence and design components, and finally ends with faculty participants’ feedback as a brief conclusion.

Citation

Wang, H. (2012). From Theory into Practice: Weaving Teaching Presence into E-Learning Design. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 495-499). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 23, 2019 from .

© 2012 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
  2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
  3. Bangert, A. (2008). The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(1), 34–61.
  4. Berge, Z. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39 (1), 5-11.
  5. Coppola, N.W., Hiltz, S.R., & Rotter, N. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (4), 169-189.
  6. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  7. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
  8. Garrison, D.R., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157-172.
  9. Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., Wiesenmayer, R., & McCluskey, F. (2010). Student perception of the relationship between indicators of teaching presence and success in online courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9 (1), 23-43.
  10. Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
  11. Paulsen, M.P. (1995). Moderating educational computer conferences. In Berge, Z.L. & Collins, M.P. (Eds.) Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom in distance education. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995.
  12. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford University.
  13. Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers and Education, 52(3), 543-553.
  14. Shea, P., Vickers, J., Hayes, S. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: Are-examination of measures and approach. International Reviews of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 127-154.
  15. Shea, P.J., Pickett, A.M., & Pelz, W.E. (2003). A follow-up investigation of “teaching presence” in the Suny Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 7(2), 61-80.
  16. Stein, D. (2004). Course structure: Most important factor in student satisfaction. Distance Education Report, 8(3), 4 F.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections