You are here:

Traits, Skills, & Competencies Aligned with Workplace Demands: What Today's Instructional Designers Need to Master
PROCEEDINGS

, , , University of North Texas, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

What are the traits, skills, and key competencies that instructional designers must have to be successful at finding and attaining employment? Analysis conducted on fifty-nine online instructional design job postings identified key competencies needed by job seekers; specifically, the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that employers communicate to possible candidates that are needed today. Findings from this study include five broad competencies in high demand such as excellent communication and related interpersonal skills and managing multiple instructional design projects, but also specific traits, and skills that may make a candidate more successful within the field such as working collaboratively in teams. This paper further discusses identified technology tools and standards that employers want instructional designers to master. Our study provides findings of interest to instructional design programs by providing supportive evidence of those needed competencies students should attain in a Masters program to ensure a successful transition into the job market upon graduation.

Citation

Wakefield, J., Warren, S. & Mills, L. (2012). Traits, Skills, & Competencies Aligned with Workplace Demands: What Today's Instructional Designers Need to Master. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3126-3132). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 20, 2019 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Albanese, M.A., Mejicano, G., Anderson, W.M., & Gruppen, L. (2010). Building a competency-based curriculum: The agony and the ecstasy. Advance in Health Science Education 15:439-454. DOI10.1007/s10459-0089118-2.
  2. Argote, L., McEvily, B, & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science. 49(4), 571-582.
  3. Auger, A. (1998). Teaching world of work skills within a degree program. Ontario agricultural college. In F.T. Evers, J.C. Rush, & I Bedrow. The bases of competence. Skills for lifelong learning and employability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Bechtel, G.A., Davidhizar, R., & Bradshaw, M.J. (1999). Problem-based learning in a competency-based world. Nurse Education Today (19), 182-187.
  5. Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for analysis and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 9-23.
  6. Carriveau, R.S. (2007) Connecting the dots. Developing student learning outcomes& Outcome based assessments.-3131 DASHDASH
  7. Dreyfus, H.L., & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind over Machine. New York: Free Press.
  8. Evers, F.T., Rush, J.C., & Berdrow, I. (1998). The bases of competence. Skills for lifelong learning and employability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Gibbons, H.S., & Wentworth, G.P. (2001). Andrological and pedagogical training differences for online instructors. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Proceedings OJDLA 2001, Gallaway, GA. Available April 22, 2010 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall43/gibbons_wentworth43.html
  10. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1999). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(1), 1999.(cid:1) IBSTPI. International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction. (2010). Competencies. Retrieved from http://ibstpi.org/competencies.htm
  11. Jonassen, D.H. (1988). Using needs assessment data to design a graduate instructional development program. Journal of Instructional Development. 11(2), 14-23.
  12. Jonassen, D.H. (2004). Learning to solve problems. An instructional design guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley& Sons, Inc.
  13. Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Andragogy versus pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Cambridge.
  14. Larson, M.B. (2005). Instructional design career environments: Survey of the alignment of preparation and practice. Techntrends. 49(6). 22-32.
  15. Nadolski, R.J., Kirschner, P.A., van Meadows, D.H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
  16. Meadows, D.H. (2008). Thinking in systems. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
  17. Molenda, M. (2003). The ADDIE model. A. Kovalchick& K. Dawson, Ed's, Educational Technology: An Encyclopedia. ABC-Clio, Santa Barbara, CA.
  18. Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Hummel, H.G.K. (2001). A model for optimizing step size of learning tasks in competency-based multimedia practicals. Educational Technology Research and Development. 49(2), 87-103.
  19. Piaget, J. (1968). The role of the concept of equilibrium. In D. Elkind [Ed]. Six psychology studies by Jean Piaget. New York: Vintage.
  20. Prawat, R.S., & Floden, R.E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructuvist views of learning. Educational Psychology, 1994, 29(1), 37-48.
  21. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activity as a model for web-based learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/f3QDdV.(cid:1) Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 19(4), 421-449.
  22. Spector, J.M., Klein, J.D., Reiser, R.A., Sims, R.C., Grabowski, B.L., & De la Teja, I. (2006). Competencies and standards for instructional design and educational technology. Available from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper89/ITForumpaper89.doc Tuxworth, E. (1989). Competence based education and training: background and origins. In J. Burke (Ed). Competency based education and training. The Falmer Press: Taylor and Francis.
  23. Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  24. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  25. Winn, W. (1996). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
  26. Wise, L, Chia, W.J., & Rudner, L.M. (1990). The secretary’s commission on achieving necessary skills. Identifying necessary job skills: A review of previous approaches. Prepared for the SCANS – The Secretary’s Commission on achieving necessary skills, employment, and training administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
  27. Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology. Active learning edition. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  28. QSR. (2011). NVIVO9. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections