You are here:

Teachers' statistical problem solving with dynamic technology: Research results across multiple institutions
ARTICLE

, North Carolina State University, United States ; , University of South Florida, United States ; , Miami University, United States ; , University of Dayton, United States ; , Brigham Young University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 12, Number 3, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This study examined a random stratified sample (n = 62) of prospective teachers' work across eight institutions on three tasks that utilized dynamic statistical software. The authors considered how teachers utilized their statistical knowledge and technological statistical knowledge to engage in cycles of investigation. This paper characterizes their problem solving and the ways they represented and explored data and discusses how teachers' work with representations seems to inform their problem solving. Recommendations are included for ways mathematics teacher educators can engage teachers in developing their knowledge for doing and teaching statistics with technology.

Citation

Lee, H., Kersaint, G., Harper, S., Driskell, S. & Leatham, K. (2012). Teachers' statistical problem solving with dynamic technology: Research results across multiple institutions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 286-307. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 20, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ainsworth, S.E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers& Education, 33, 131-152.
  2. Arnold, P. (2009, July). Context and its role in posing investigative questions. Paper presented at the sixth annual conference of the International Collaboration for Research on Statistical Reasoning Thinking and Literacy, Brisbane, Australia.
  3. Chance, B., Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J., & Medina, E. (2007). The role of technology in improving student learning of statistics. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sd2t4rr
  4. Doerr, H., & Jacob, B. (2011). Investigating secondary teachers’ statistical understandings. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 776-786). Retrieved from http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/5/CERME_DoerrJacob.pdf
  5. Finzer, W. (2002). Fathom dynamic data software (version 2.1) [Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
  6. Hammerman, J.K., & Rubin, A. (2004). Strategies for managing statistical complexity with new software tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 17-39.
  7. Konold, C., & Higgins, T. (2003). Reasoning about data. In J. Kilpatrick, W.G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 196-215). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  8. Konold, C., & Miller, C.D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration [Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
  9. Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2002), Data analysis as the search for signals in noisy processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 259-289.
  10. Lee, H.S., & Hollebrands, K.F. (2011). Characterizing and developing teachers’ knowledge for teaching statistics. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-Challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 359-369). New York, NY: Springer.
  11. Lee, H.S., Hollebrands, K.F., & Wilson, P.H. (2010). Preparing to teach mathematics with technology: An integrated approach to data analysis and probability. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishers.
  12. Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2008) Dynamic statistical software: How are learners using it to conduct data-based investigations? In Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C., & Rossman, A. (Eds). Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education. Proceeding of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 Roundtable Conference, Monterrey, MX. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/~icmi/iase_study/Makar_ICMI17.pdf
  13. McClain, K. (2003, July). Supporting teacher change: A case from statistics. Paper presented at the 27th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED501024).
  14. McClain, K. (2008). The evolution of teachers’ understanding of distribution. In Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C., & Rossman, A. (Eds). Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 Roundtable Conference, Monterrey, MX. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/rt08/T2P8_McClain.pdf
  15. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Paparistodemou, E., & Stylianou, D. (2009). Enhancing statistics instruction in elementary schools: Integrating technology in professional development. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(1 & 2), 57-78.
  16. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  17. Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. (2004). Towards an understanding of statistical thinking. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79-95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  18. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  19. Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry (with discussion). International Statistical Review, 67, 223-265.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.