You are here:

Learning Mathematics with Technology: The Influence of Virtual Manipulatives on Different Achievement Groups
ARTICLE

, Utah State University, United States ; , George Mason University, United States

JCMST Volume 31, Number 1, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This study examined the influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups during a teaching experiment in four fifth-grade classrooms. During a two-week unit focusing on two rational number concepts (fraction equivalence and fraction addition with unlike denominators) one low achieving, two average achieving, and one high achieving group participated in two instructional treatments (three groups used virtual manipulatives and one group used physical manipulatives). Data sources included pre- and post-tests of students’ mathematical content knowledge and videotapes of classroom sessions.
Results of paired samples t-tests examining the three groups using virtual manipulatives indicated a statistically significant overall gain following the treatment. Follow-up paired samples individual t-tests on the low, average, and high achieving groups indicated a statistically significant gain for students in the low achieving group, but only numerical gains for students in the average and high achieving groups. There were no significant differences between the average achieving student groups in the virtual manipulatives and physical manipulatives treatments. Qualitative data gathered during the study indicated that the different achievement groups experienced the virtual manipulatives in different ways, with the high achieving group recognizing patterns quickly and transitioning to the use of symbols, while the average and low achieving groups relied heavily on pictorial representations as they methodically worked step-by-step through processes and procedures with mathematical symbols.

Citation

Moyer-Packenham, P. & Suh, J. (2012). Learning Mathematics with Technology: The Influence of Virtual Manipulatives on Different Achievement Groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 39-59. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Understanding How Teachers Influence the Effectiveness of STEM-Based Mobile Apps

    Robin Kay, UOIT, Canada

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2018 (Oct 15, 2018) pp. 1182–1186

  2. Affordances of Simultaneous Linking Features in a Base-10 Blocks Mathematics App for Young Children

    Kristy Litster, Patricia Moyer-Packenham & Rachel Reeder, Utah State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 761–767

  3. Examining Children’s Interactions with Mathematics Virtual Manipulatives on iPads: Proactive and Reactive Attribute Modification

    Stephen Tucker & Teri Johnson, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2016 (Jun 28, 2016) pp. 1683–1688

  4. The Influence of Class Sets of Mobile Devices on Student Learning

    Nick Lux & Art Bangert, Montana State University, United States; Miles McGeehan & Rob Watson, Bozeman School District, United States; Kathryn Will-Dubyak, Montana State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 1658–1666

  5. Effects of Online Math Applets on Students’ Mathematical Thinking

    Mustafa Demir, University of Detroit Mercy, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1405–1410

  6. Online Applets in Mathematics Teaching: The Case of Linear Functions

    Mustafa Demir, University of Detroit Mercy, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 352–358

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.