You are here:

The Influence of Technology Rich Learning Environments: A Classroom-based Observational Study

, , , ALTEC/Center for Research on Learning, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


The Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE), through the Technology Rich Classroom (TRC) Program, has offered Enhancing Education through Technology (EETT) competitive grant awards to grades three through eight in Kansas since 2003. This study examines the effects of a Technology Rich Classroom environment including the differences in teacher and student use of technology, classroom grouping strategies and higher order thinking skills utilized in classrooms. The study described in this paper provides some evidence that including technology in a classroom, training teachers how to use the technology, and providing support for technology use may change many aspects of the learning environment.


Craig Hare, J., Ault, M. & Niileksela, C. (2011). The Influence of Technology Rich Learning Environments: A Classroom-based Observational Study. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4304-4311). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Cornett, J., & Knight, J. (2008). Research on Coaching. In J. Knight (Ed.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  2. Edutopia. (2009). Core Concepts: Project-Based Learning. Edutopia Retrieved October 5, 2010, from
  3. Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Everlove, S. (2009). Productive GroupWork: How to Engage Students, Build Teamwork, and Promote Understanding. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  4. Harrop, A. & Daniels, M. (1986). Methods of time sampling: A reappraisal of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 73-77.
  5. Hopson, M.H. (1998). Effects of a technology enriched learning environment on student development of higher order thinking skills. Denton, TX, University of North Texas.
  6. House, J.D. (2005). Classroom instruction and science achievement in Japan, Hong Kong, and Chinese Taipei: Results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(3), 295-311.
  7. Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Interobserver agreement. Chapter 3 in A.E. Kazdin (Ed.), Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (pp 48-75). New York: Oxford.
  8. Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of new information technologies on teachers and students. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 369–376.
  9. Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press.
  10. Law, Y. (2008). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Second Graders' Learning from Text. Educational Psychology, 28(5), 567-582.
  11. Lemke, C. And Coughlin,E. (1998). Technology in American schools: Seven dimensions for gauging progress. Santa Monica, Milken Family Foundation. Mishra, P. And M. Koehler (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Michigan State University Teacher's College Record 108(6), 1017-1054.
  12. Rossi, J.S. (1985). "Tables of effect size for z score tests of differences between proportions and between correlation coefficients." Educational and Psychological Measurement 45: 737-743.
  13. Saudargas, R.A. & Zanolli, K. (1990). Momentary time sampling as an estimate of percentage time: A field validation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 533-537.
  14. Schneiderman, M. (2004). What does SBR mean for educational technology. T.H.E. Journal, 31(11), 30-36.
  15. Strudler, N., & Hearrington, D.. (2009). Quality support for ICT in schools. In J. Voogt& G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 579-596). New York:
  16. Waxman, H.C., Lin, M., & Michko, G.M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes.
  17. Wegerif, R. (2002). Literature review in thinking skills, technology and learning: Report 2. UK, National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact