You are here:

Instructional Technology Adoption Strategies for College of Education Faculty
PROCEEDINGS

, National-Louis University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The findings of this study assist in the identification of the best techniques for professional developers to consider when encouraging college of education faculty members to adopt instructional technology (IT). Multi-year survey data, Q Methodology, and videotaped interviews were used to identify three distinct groups of IT-using faculty: Innovative Everyday IT-using Educators; Experienced, but Skeptical IT-using Educators; and Purposeful IT-using Educators. Professional development techniques are also aligned to each group to suit their needs. Using Rogers’ “Diffusion of Innovation” theories of complexity, compatibility, relative advantage, observability, and trialability as a framework, this study also investigates TPACK, lines of communication, and motivational factors. An online collection of 224 carefully edited video-taped comments from college of education faculty is aligned to these concepts and can be found at the author’s website. By design, this study creates a mechanism whereby faculty could learn “virtually” from other faculty about their use of IT.

Citation

Bowe, R. (2011). Instructional Technology Adoption Strategies for College of Education Faculty. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1778-1785). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bowe, R., & Pierson, M. (2008). Professional development in educational technology: What have we learned so far? In A. Borthwick& M. Pierson (Eds.), Transforming Classroom Practice. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
  2. Brown, C. (2001). The use of technology by teacher education faculty for problem solving and higher-order thinking skills. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, AR.
  3. Carr, S.C. (1992). A primer on the use of Q-technique factor analysis. Measurement& Evaluation in Counseling& Development, 25(3), 133-139.
  4. Cohen, M., Pellegrino, J.W., Schmidt, D., & Schultz, S. (2007). Sustaining technology integration in teacher education. Action in Journal Education, 29(3), 75-87.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55, 6-11.
  6. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  7. Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 8(3/4), 10.
  8. Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R., & Abrami, P. (2006). Are we using technology for learning? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(4), 401-425.
  9. Marcum, J.W. (2006). After the information age: A dynamic learning manifesto. New York: Peter Lang.
  10. Moursund, D., & Bielfeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in the digital age? Eugene, OR: International Society for
  11. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  12. Sahin, I., & Thompson, A. (2006). Using Rogers' theory to interpret instructional computer use by co-faculty. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 8-13.
  13. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with Technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College.
  14. Schachtel, E.G. (1963). Metamorphosis; on the development, of affect, perception, attention and memory. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
  15. Schmoker, M.J. (1999). Results: The key to continuous school improvement (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  16. Vygotskij, L.S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  17. Young, J. (2006). Better technology in high schools raises student's expectations. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(5), A31.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.