You are here:

Web Video Project as an Instructional Strategy in Teacher Education
PROCEEDINGS

, York University, Canada ; , University of West Alabama, United States ; , York University, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The advent of Web 2.0 has metamorphosed the landscape of the Internet from a static “depository” of multimedia data into a dynamic and participatory “habitat” of individuals. Web video, epitomized by YouTube, is particularly suited to student-centered design of learning where students make their own choice of video they want to use to enhance their learning. User-generated web video can be created and shared freely and openly over the Internet by anyone and its value lies in its content and the way it is authored rather than in its delivery method or the media player used to display it over the web. This paper discusses the qualities of this emerging type of Web video, offers a conceptual framework for the integration of user-generated Web video into student learning, and shares practical experience of Web video application in the teacher education curriculum in a regional university in Alabama.

Citation

Lupshenyuk, D., Hocutt, M. & Owston, R. (2011). Web Video Project as an Instructional Strategy in Teacher Education. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 984-991). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alexa Internet (2010). [The Web Information Company] Traffic Ratings. San Francisco, CA: Alexa Internet, Inc. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com
  2. Bassili, J.N. (2008). Motivation and cognitive strategies in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 129-148.
  3. Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Bishop, J. (2009). Pre-service teacher discourses: Authoring selves through multimodal compositions. Digital Culture& Education, 1(1), 31-50.
  5. Bonk, C.J. (2008, March). YouTube anchors and enders: The use of shared online video content as a macrocontext
  6. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  7. Burke, S.C., & Snyder, S.L. (2008). YouTube: An innovative learning resource for college health education courses. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 11, 39-46.
  8. Caladine, R. (2008). Enhancing e-learning with media-rich content and interactions. Hershey, PA: Information
  9. Kulkarni, A. (2007). Content-based image retrieval using associative memories. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Telecommunications and Informatics (pp. 99-104). Dallas, TX.
  10. Lave, J. (1990). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In J.W. Stigler, R.A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 309-327). Cambridge:
  11. Cambridge University PressLave, J. (1991). Legitimate peripheral participation. In J. Lave & E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (pp. 27-43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  12. Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., Simons, P.R.-J., & Admiraal, W. (2009). Streaming video to enhance students’ reflection in dance education. Computers& Education, 52, 169-176.
  13. Macfadyen, L.P. (2006). In a world of text, is the author king? The revolutionary potential of Wiki (open content) technologies. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, and C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology, Murdoch University, Australia, 285-298.
  14. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA,
  15. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A.D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portfolio.
  16. Trier, J. (2007). “ Cool” engagements with YouTube: Part 1. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 50(5), 408412.
  17. Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008, April). Why Web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes. Paper presented at the International WorldWide Web Conference 2008, Beijing, China.
  18. Wu, C.-C., & Kao, H.-C. (2008). Streaming videos in peer assessment to support training pre-service teachers. Educational Technology& Society, 11(1), 45-55.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides