You are here:

Blended Learning: An Asian Perspective

, University of Newcastle, Australia ; , Stirling University, UK, Singapore

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This paper examines the current stage of development of blended learning in higher education in China, Korea and Japan, with a comparison to the city state of Singapore. It is noted that blended learning and e-learning are introduced at institutes of higher learning in these countries with varying degrees of success. In China, for example, while blended learning was well-received, the dominance of traditional teaching methods goes against the conditions required for mainstreaming e-Learning. A review of existing literature showed that there are a host of key issues and challenges which prevent Asian countries from harnessing the full potential of blended learning in higher education.


Tham, R. & Tham, L. (2011). Blended Learning: An Asian Perspective. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 684-691). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Chamberlain M. And Reynolds C. (2007). Blended Learning Initiatives in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. In C. Montgomerie& J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 23972402).
  2. Gardner (1989) as cited in“ Globalised eLearning” Cross-Cultural Dimensions, p23, Andrea
  3. Henderson L. (1996), Instructional design of interactive multimedia: A cultural critique. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(4), 85-104.
  4. Huang R. And Zhou Y. (2006), Designing Blended Learning Focused on Knowledge Category and Learning Activities. Case studies from Beijing Normal University, in The Handbook of Blended Learning (p296-310), Curtis J Bonk and Charles R Graham (2006).
  5. IDA (2009), Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA), Singapore Tops Waseda University e-Government Ranking. Available from
  6. Jung I. And Suzuki K. (2006), Blended Learning in Japan and Its Application in Liberal Arts Education, in The Handbook of Blended Learning (p 267-280), Curtis J Bonk and Charles R
  7. Graham (2006).
  8. Kaleta R., Skibba K., and Joosten T. (2007), Discovering, Design, and Delivering Hybrid Course, pg 111 Blended Learning Research Perspectives, Edited by Anthony G. Picciano and Charles D. Dziuban. The Sloan Consortium, 2007, p111.
  9. Koper R. (2004). Use of the semantic web to solve some basic problems in education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, No 6.
  10. Latchem C., Jung I., Aoki K., and OzkulA. E. (2008). The Tortoise and the hare enigma in etransformation in Japanese and Korean higher education. In British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 39 No 4 2008.
  11. McConnell D. And Zhao J. (2006) Chinese Higher Education Teachers’ Conceptions of eLearning: Preliminary outcomes. Lancaster University.
  12. Menkhoff T., Thang T.Y. And Wong Y.K. (2007), Evaluating The Blending Of An E-Learning Module Into A Knowledge Management Course: A Case Study From The Singapore Management University (SMU), September 2007.
  13. Miliszewska I. (2007), Transnational Education Programs: Student Reflections on a Fully-Online Versus a Hybrid Model. Victoria University, School of Computer Science and Mathematics.
  14. Mohamed A.C., Matthias J. And Dirk F.W. (2007), “ The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software”, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 3, Nos 4/5, 2007.
  15. Oblinger D.G. (2006), Sharing educational resources worldwide: an interview with Shimizu Yasutaka. EDUCAUSE Review, 41, 4.
  16. Papadakis S., Paparrizos K. And Rossiou E. (2006). Using Blended Learning in Traditional Faceto-Face Instruction: A case study teaching Algorithms to undergraduate students. In T. Reeves& S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (pp. 839-845). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  17. Protheroe N., and Turner J. (2003), Culturally sensitive instruction. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
  18. Ramburuthi P. And McCormick J. (2001), Learning diversity in higher education: A comparative study of Asian international and Australian students, Higher Education 42: 333 – 350, 2001, © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
  19. Verkroost M., Meijerink L., Lintsen H. And Veen W. (2008), Finding a Balance in Dimensions of Blended Learning. International Journal on E-Learning. 7 (3), pp. 499-522. Chesapeake, VA:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact