You are here:

Prime the Pipeline Project (P3): Putting Knowledge to Work

, Arizona State University, United States ; , Wattle and Daub Research, United States ; , Rio Salado College, United States ; , , Arizona State University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 11, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


With funding from NSF, the Prime the Pipeline Project (P3) is responding to the need to strengthen the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pipeline from high school to college by developing and evaluating the scientific village strategy and the culture it creates. The scientific village, a community of high school students, teachers as learners, undergraduate students as mentors, and university scientists as leaders, collaborate to solve challenging long-term problems/projects that develop villagers’ expertise with STEM concepts/skills and give them a taste of the work of STEM professionals. Data were collected from both a group of intervention students and a matched control group to address the research question, “Does participation in P3 increase students' interest in and success with the study of mathematics and science in high school?” Data were collected through surveys and interviews to address the question, “Does participation in P3 change teachers' instructional practice and expectations for student performance?” Results showed that intervention students completed significantly more and more advanced courses in science and mathematics in high school, and their GPAs were significantly higher than their matched controls. Surveys of students’ postsecondary plans and intended college majors confirmed increased interest in STEM or business fields.


Greenes, C., Wolfe, S., Weight, S., Cavanagh, M. & Zehring, J. (2011). Prime the Pipeline Project (P3): Putting Knowledge to Work. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 21-46. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Allen, W.R., Bonous-Hammarth, M., & Suh, S.A. (2005). Who goes to college? High school context, academic preparation, the college choice process, and college attendance. In E. St. John (Ed.), Readings on equal education (Vol. 20). Improving access and college success for diverse students: Studies of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program (pp. 71-113). Brooklyn, NY: AMS Press.
  2. Arizona Department of Education. (2009). Arizona’s instrument for measuring standards: AIMS report wizard. Retrieved from
  3. Arrington, K. (2000). Middle grades career planning programs. Journal of Career Development, 27(2), 103-109.
  4. Aronson, J., Zimmerman, J., & Carlos, L. (1998). Improving student achievement by extending school: Is it just a matter of time? Retrieved from
  5. Boyd, D.J., Grossman, P.L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
  6. Bray, H. (2010, June 22). Raytheon CEO calls for more tech education. Business Updates from the Boston Globe. Retrieved from
  7. Bronson, E. (2007). Helping CTE students learn to their potential. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 82(7).
  8. ChanLin, L.J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55-65.
  9. Clark, A.C., & Ernst, J.V. (2007). A model for the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Technology Teacher, 66(4), 24-26.
  10. Corcoran, T., & Silander, M. (2009). Instruction in high schools: The evidence and the challenge. Future of Children, 19(1), 157-183.
  11. Couto, V., Mani, M., Lewin, A.Y., & Peeters, C. (2007). The globalization of white-collar work: The facts and fallout of next-generation offshoring. Retrieved from the Duke University Fuqua School of Business Offshoring Research Network website:
  12. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.
  13. Fernandez-Santander, A. (2008). Cooperative learning combined with short periods of lecturing: A good alternative in teaching biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(1), 34-38.
  14. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & ClayChambers, J. (2008) Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939.
  15. Gewertz, C. (2007, March 29). Outside interests. Education Week. Retrieved from
  16. Griffin, K.A., Allen, W.R., Kimura-Walsh, E., & Yamamura, E.K. (2007). Those who left, those who stayed: Exploring the educational opportunities of high-achieving black and latina/o students at magnet and non-magnet Los Angeles high schools (2001-2002). Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 42(3), 229-247.
  17. Haladyna, T., Olsen, R., & Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Relations of student, teacher and learning environment variables to attitudes toward science. Science Education. 66, 671687.
  18. Helle, L., Tynjala, P., Olkinuora, E., & Lonka, K. (2007). Ain't nothin' like the real thing: Motivation and study processes on a work-based project course in information systems design. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 397-411.
  19. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
  20. Hughes, K.L., Bailey, T.R., & Karp, M.M. (2002). School-to-work: Making a difference in education. The Phi Delta Kappa International, 84(4), 272-279.
  21. Jones, M.S. (2005, April). Science for all: Promoting interest and participation in a diverse middle school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  22. Kalman, C.S. (2007). Successful science and engineering teaching in colleges and universities. Boston, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.
  23. Kazis, R. (2005). Remaking career and technical education for the 21st century: What role for high school programs? Retrieved from the Jobs for the Future website:
  24. Kendall, J.S., Pollack, C., Schwols, A., & Snyder, C. (2007). High school standards and expectations for college and the work-place (Issues& Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 001). Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, website:
  25. Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). PBL handbook: A guide to standardsfocused project based learning for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
  26. Meeder, H. (2008). The Perkins Act of 2006: Connecting career and technical education with the college and career readiness agenda (2008 Policy Brief). Retrieved from the Achieve, Inc., website:
  27. Mullis, V.S., Martin, M.O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from the IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  28. National Academies of Science. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  29. National Mathematics Panel. (2007). Final report on the national survey of algebra teachers for the National Math Panel. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  30. National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  31. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Education at a glance 2007. Paris, France: Author. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007, September). Beyond the three Rs: Voter attitudes toward 21st century skills. Retrieved from
  32. Public Works. (2006). From education to work: Is Arizona prepared? (The Alignment Project Report). Phoenix, AZ: Arizona P-20 Council. Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000 (Report No. 20919). Retrieved from
  33. Sedlacek, W.E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
  34. Sedacek, W.E., & Sheu, H.B. (2004, January). Predicting the academic success of Gates Millennium Scholars. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Convention, San Diego, CA.
  35. Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79(4), 437-473.
  36. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87101.
  37. State Educational Technology Directors Association. (2008). Science, technology, engineering. Retrieved from
  38. Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Closing the teacher gap. Phi Delta Kappa, 92, 32-37.
  39. Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  40. Stone, J.R. III, Alfeld, C., & Pearson, D. (2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 767-795.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact