You are here:

Social Tagging in Knowledge Organisation –Online Survey on the Users’ Perspective
PROCEEDINGS

, , Knowledge Media Research Center, Germany

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Social tagging ranges amongst the “killer applications” of Web 2.0. Websites such as the photo database Flickr and the bookmarking service Del.icio.us are being used by an ever-growing international community. In addition, a number of other portals use tagging to compile user-specific metadata on information of all types – whether it be travel destinations, personal contacts, films or museum exhibits. Retrieving and storing information via tagging seem to meet the user’s needs for a number of purposes and in many contexts. This article explores the potential and limitations of tagging as a tool for shared and personal knowledge organization. Starting with a synopsis of the current literature on social tagging, it then focuses on the results of an online questionnaire, to explore motives and usage patterns for social tagging services.

Citation

Panke, S. & Gaiser, B. (2009). Social Tagging in Knowledge Organisation –Online Survey on the Users’ Perspective. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3438-3447). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. AGOF (2007). Internetfacts 2007. Teil I / Basisdaten zur Internet-Nutzung. Available online: http://www.agof.de/studie.353.html
  2. Ames, M. & Naaman, M. (2007). Why We Tag: Motivations for Annotation in Mobile and Online Media. In B. Rosson and D. Gilmore (eds.) Proceedings of the CHI 2007, San Jose, California: ACM Press, pp. 971-980.
  3. Béguin, P. (2003). Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interacting with Computers, 15, 709-730.
  4. Golder, S.A. And Huberman, B.A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. In Journal of Information Science, 32 (2), pp. 198-208.
  5. Golder, A.S. & Huberman, B.A. (2005). The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0508082
  6. Good, B.M., Kawas, E.A. & Wilkinson, M.D. (2007). Bridging the gap between social tagging and semantic annotation: E.D. The Entity Describer. Preprint available online (Nature Proceedings): http://precedings.nature.com/documents/945/version/2
  7. Guy, M. & Tonkin, E. (2006). Folksonomies-Tidying up Tags? In D-Lib 12 (1). Available online: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html
  8. Lee, K.J. (2006). What goes around comes around: an analysis of Del.icio.us as social space. In Proceedings of CSCW '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 191-194.
  9. Macgregor, G., & McCulloch, E. (2006). Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review 55(5), 291-300.
  10. Marchetti, A., Tesconi, M., Ronzano, F., Rosella, M. & Minutoli, S. (2007). SemKey: A Semantic Collaborative Tagging System. In C. Williamson, M.E. Zurko, P. Patel-Schneider and P. Shenoy (eds). WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on WorldWide Web, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press. Available online: http://www.daniellemire.com/blog/archives/2007/04/11/www-20007-tagging-and-metadata-for-social-information-organization-workshop/
  11. Michlmayr, E. & Cayzer, S. (2007). Learning User Profiles from Tagging Data and Leveraging them for Personal(ized) Information Access. In In C. Williamson, M.E. Zurko, P. Patel-Schneider and P. Shenoy (eds). WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on WorldWide Web, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press. Available online: http://www.daniellemire.com/blog/archives/2007/04/11/www-20007-tagging-and-metadata-for-social-information-organization-workshop/
  12. Morville, P. (2006). Ambient Findability: what we find changes who we become. Cambridge: O'Reilly.
  13. Panke, S., & Gaiser, B. (2008). "With my head up in the clouds"-Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht. In B. Gaiser, T. Hampel, & S. Panke (Eds.), Good Tags-Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (pp. 23-35). Münster: Waxmann.
  14. Rader, E. & Wash, R. (2008). Influences on tag choices in del.icio.us. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (SanDiego, CA, USA, November 08-12, 2008). CSCW '08. ACM, New York, NY, 239-248.
  15. Rainie, L. (2007). Tagging Play. Available online: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/402/tagging-play
  16. Steels, L. (2006). Collaborative tagging as distributed cognition, Pragmatics& Cognition. (14/2), pp. 287-292
  17. Weinberger, D. (2007). Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder. Times Books, New York NY.
  18. Yew, J., Gibson, F.P. & Teasley, S.D. (2006). Learning by Tagging: The Role of Social Tagging in Group Knowledge Formation. In MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2 (4). Available online: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol2no4/yew.pdf
  19. Zollers, A. (2007). Emerging Motivations for Tagging: Expression, Performance, and Activism. In C. Williamson, M.E. Zurko, P. Patel-Schneider and P. Shenoy (eds). WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on WorldWide Web, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press. Available online: http://www2007.org/workshops/paper_55.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.