You are here:

A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Education Faculty Development Models for Technology Integration
ARTICLE

, Consultant, Center for Applied Linguistics, United States ; , University of Maryland, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 18, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Research shows that unless university-based teacher educators effectively integrate technology into teacher education courses, students (pre-service and in-service teachers) are unlikely to use technology effectively in their own teaching. This creates negative repercussions in teacher education and in the schools. However, many teacher educators do not feel competent or equipped to integrate technology into their courses for a host of reasons, including the fact that they work for institutions that do not offer relevant, adequate faculty development in technology integration. This article uses research-based criteria to analyze and compare seven faculty development models for teacher education technology integration. These models are organized into three broad categories: (a) workshops, (b) mentoring, and (c) university-school collaborations. The comparative analysis reveals that some models are distinctly more effective than others. It also shows that, based on all the studies analyzed, not a single one describes a faculty development model that meets all of the fundamental criteria for excellence in faculty development. If universities start using criteria for excellent faculty development in teacher education technology integration and intentionally gear their efforts toward those criteria, positive changes in technology use could occur in teacher education and hence in schools.

Citation

Yilmazel-Sahin, Y. & Oxford, R.L. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Education Faculty Development Models for Technology Integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 693-720. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abbott, J. A., & Faris, S. E. (2000). Integrating technology into pre-service literacy instruction: a survey of elementary education students’ attitudes toward computers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (2), 149-161.
  2. Backer, P. & Saltmarch, M. (2000). Development of an effective multimedia/www training model for faculty. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology 2000 (pp. 39-43).
  3. Beisser, S. (2000). Technology mentorships in higher education: an optimal match for expanding educational computing skills, in B. Gillan & K. Mcferrin (eds.) Faculty Development. ERic document (ed444497).
  4. Bell, R., & Hofer, M. (2003). The curry school of education and long-term commitment to technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology
  5. Bitner, N. & Bitner, J. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: eight keys to success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95-100. Blair, K. & Madigan, D. (2000). Involving faculty in faculty development: a Recursive model. In C. Crawford et al. (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2000 (pp. 418-423). Chesapeake, Va: aace.
  6. Brewer, S. (1997, summer). What works. Portland: northwest Regional educational laboratory. Retrieved february 2, 2008 from http://www.nwrel.org/nwedu/summer_97/article7.html
  7. Brzycki, D. & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming Barriers to Technology Use in Teacher Preparation Programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,13 (4), 619-641. Norfolk, Va: aace.
  8. Chatel, R. (2002). Empowering higher education faculty to use technology to enhance teaching and learning: a peer-mentoring program. In B. Gillian
  9. Chuang, H., Thompson, A., & Schmidt, D. (2003, summer). Faculty technology mentoring programs: major trends in the literature. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19, 101-106.
  10. Cifarelli, V. V. (1998). The development of mental representations as a problem solving activity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 239-264.
  11. Clark, F. (2002). Faculty development. Retrieved march 21, 2008, from http://pt3.altec.org/stories/texas_a&M.html
  12. Cohen, D.K. & Hill, J. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New haven, cT: Yale University Press.
  13. Cooley, N., & Johnston, M. (2000, september/October). Why can’t we just get on with it? forces in P-16 education that complicate the integration of technology into teaching and learning. The Technology Source. Retrieved february 15, 2008 from http://technologysource.org/?view=article&id=428
  14. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, ca: sage Publications.
  15. Gallant, G. (2000). Professional development for web-based teaching: Overcoming innocence and resistance. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 88, 69-78.
  16. Hagner, P. R. (2001). Interesting practices and best systems in faculty engagement and support. Final report, nlii focus session held in seattle in february 2000. Retrieved february 17, 2008 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/nli0017.pdf
  17. Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development: Individualizing technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12 (2), 239-262. Norfolk, Va: aace.
  18. Kelly, J. T., & Leckbee, R. (1998). Reality check: What do we really know about technology and how do we know it? Syllabus, 12(1), 24 26.
  19. Levin, D. & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Pew internet and american
  20. Maduakolam, I., & Bell, E. (2003). A product-based faculty professional development model for infusing technology into teacher education. Contemporary
  21. Mccoy, A. H. (2000). Building a vision for technology integration. In crawford, C., Willis, D., carlsen, R., Gibson, I., mcferrin, K., Price, J., & Weber, R. (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2000 (pp. 451-456). Chesapeake, Va: aace.
  22. McKenzie, J. (1991, april). Designing staff development for the information age. From Now On, 1(4) Retrieved on april 1, 2008 from http://staffdevelop.org/adult.html
  23. Murray, J. P. (2002). The current state of faculty development in two-year colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 118, 89-97.
  24. Nardi, B.A. (1999). Introduction. In nardi, B.A. & Engeström, Y. (eds.). A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work (pp. 1-8). Special issue of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1 & 2, 1-167.
  25. National council on the accreditation of Teacher education (ncaTe) (2006). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, dc. Retrieved on april 1, 2006 from http://www.ncate.org/public/unitstandardsRubrics.asp?ch=4
  26. National staff development council. (1995). Standards for staff development. Oxford, Ohio: national staff development council.
  27. Norton, P., & Sprague, D. (2001). Technology for teaching. Needham heights, ma: allyn and bacon.
  28. Oxford, R., & Yilmazel-sahin, Y. (2004). Enriching teacher education via technology, styles, and strategies. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 35563561). Norfolk, Va: aace.
  29. Pierson, M.E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. [electronic version]. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
  30. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. Boston: mcGraw-hill.
  31. Rogers, D.L. (2000). A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educational Technology Review, spring/summer, 1927.
  32. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Fifth edition. New York, nY: The free Press.
  33. Rups, P. (1999). Training instructors in new technologies. T.H.E. (Technological Horizons in Education) Journal. Retrieved on november 21, 2005 from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/a2099.cfm
  34. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: doubleday currency.
  35. Schön, D.A. (1973) Beyond the stable state. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
  36. Strehle, E., Whatley, A., Kurz, K. & Hausfather, S. (2002). Narratives of collaboration: inquiring into technology integration in teacher education. Journal
  37. Swain, C. (2005). Technology in teacher education: Faculty visions and decision making. Paper presented at the national education computing conference. Retrieved 22 June 2006 from web.oregon.edu/isTe/uploads/necc2005/KeY_64473637/swain_swainnecc2005_RP.pdf
  38. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science,12, 257-285.
  39. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. NY, mcGraw hill.
  40. Teclehaimanot, B. & Lamb, A. (2005). Workshops that work!: building an effective, technology-rich faculty development program. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 109-115.
  41. Vannatta, R. (2000). Evaluation to planning: Technology integration in a school of education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 231-246. Waddoups, G. L., Wentworth, N., & Earle, R. (2004). Teaming with technology: a case study of a faculty design team developing electronic portfolios. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(3), 113-120.
  42. Warschauer, M. (2003). “dissecting the “digital divide”: a case study in egypt.” The Information Society, 19, 297-304.
  43. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, nY: milken family foundation and educational Testing service.
  44. Willis, E. M., & Raines, P. (2001). Technology in secondary teacher education. T. H. E. Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 29(2), 54. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/a3638.cfm

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Teaching with Technology Through Collaborative Student-Faculty Partnerships

    Pearl Chen, Alexandra Heinemann, Hsiang-Yu Ho & Moses You, California State University, Los Angeles, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2018 (Oct 15, 2018) pp. 281–286

  2. Technological Modeling: Faculty Use of Technologies in Preservice Teacher Education from 2004 to 2012

    Joan E. Hughes, Sa Liu & Mihyun Lim, University of Texas at Austin, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 16, No. 2 (June 2016) pp. 184–207

  3. Examining Doctoral Students’ Formal and Informal Technology Education

    Debra R Sprague, Melissa Pierczynski & Theresa Wills, George Mason University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 1435–1440

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.