Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 18, Number 1, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a technology integration model designed to assist pre-service teachers to learn meaningful uses of technology in K–12 classrooms. Based on studies in teacher education, learning theory, and technology integration, the authors define five essential characteristics necessary for pre-service teacher education: (a) providing concrete experience, (b) promoting reflection, (c) assisting knowledge application to actual practice, (d) creating communities of learners, and (e) developing Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) (Mishra & Koehler, 2006; Thompson & Mishra, 2007-2008). The Situated Technology Integration (SiTI) model was developed based on these characteristics. This paper explains the SiTI model in detail and shares data on its implementation processes.
Hur, J.W., Cullen, T. & Brush, T. (2010). Teaching for Application: A Model for Assisting Pre-Service Teachers With Technology Integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 161-182. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 25, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29461/.
© 2010 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
- Dexter, S., Doering, A. H., & Riedel, E. (2006). Content area specific technology integration: a model for educating teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 325–345.
- Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342–361.
- Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
- Goldman, S. R. (2001). Professional development in a digital age: Issues and challenges for standards-based reform. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 2, 19–46.
- Howard, J. (2002). Technology-enhanced project based learning in teacher education: addressing the goals of transfer. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 343–364.
- Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2004). Using anchored instruction to teacher preservice teachers to integrate technology in the curriculum. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 431–445.
- Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
- Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: an international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand oaks, Ca: sage Publications.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge university Press.
- Li, Q. (2005). Infusing technology into a mathematics methods course: any impact? Educational Research, 47(2), 217–233.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
- National Center for education statistics (2002). Technology in schools: suggestions, tools and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education. Retrieved January 17, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003313.pdf
- Office of Technology assessment (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing office.
- Parana, J., West, A., Johnson-gentile, K. & Longerger, R. (2000). Preparing preservice teachers for the technological classroom: a school—college partnership. Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 97-109.
- Perry, G., & Talley, S. (2001). Online video case studies and teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(4), 26–31.
- Pierson, M. E., & Mcneil, S. (2000). Preservice technology integration through collaborative action communities. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 189–199.
- Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191–203.
- Sadera, W. A., & Hargrave, C. P. (2005). Conceptual change in pre-service teacher technology preparation. In C. Varsidas & G. V. Glass (eds.), Preparing teachers to teach with technology. Greenwich, Co: Information age Publishing Inc.
- Sherry, L., & Chiero, R. (2004). Project TalenT: Infusing technology in K–12 field placements through a learning community model. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 265–297.
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
- Thompson, A. & Mishra, P. (2007-2008). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPaCK. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38-39.
- U.S. Department of education. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education. How the internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Retrieved February 8, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/theplan/netp_Final.pdf
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge university Press.
- Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23–48.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Preservice Teacher Computer Science Preparation: A Case Study of an Undergraduate Computer Education Licensure Program
Gamze Ozogul, Mike Karlin & Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Indiana University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 26, No. 3 (July 2018) pp. 375–409
Not Another Workshop: Designing Quality Faculty Development that Supports Technology Use in Teacher Education
Andrea Parrish & William Sadera, Towson University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 3011–3014
David Byrum, Doug Holschuh & Shaunna Smith, Texas State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3096–3105
Alison Egan, Marino Institute of Education, Ireland; Ann FitzGibbon, Keith Johnston & Elizabeth Oldham, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 2287–2294
Laurene Johnson, Hezel Associates, LLC, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 2544–2551
An Investigation of a Pre-Service Elementary Mathematics Teacher’s Techno- Pedagogical Content Knowledge within the Context of Teaching Practices
Esra Balgalmis, Turkey; Erdinç Cakiroglu, Middle East Technical University, Turkey; Kathryn Shafer, Ball State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 2210–2217
Kathryn Shafer, Ball State University, United States; Rejoice Mudzimiri, University of Southern Mississippi, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 4858–4860
Student Response Systems in the College Classroom: An Investigation of Short-term, Intermediate, and Long-term Recall of Facts
Erika Blood, Northern Illinois University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 20, No. 1 (January 2012) pp. 5–20
Carol Hodes, Sandra Pritz, Patricia Kelley & John Foster, NOCTI, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 11, No. 3 (September 2011) pp. 313–323
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.