You are here:

Teaching Science with Technology: Case Studies of Science Teachers' Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK)
Article

, , University of Minnesota, United States

CITE Journal Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This study examines the development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) in four in-service secondary science teachers as they participated in a professional development program focusing on technology integration into K-12 classrooms to support science as inquiry teaching. In the program, probeware, mind-mapping tools (CMaps), and Internet applications ? computer simulations, digital images, and movies — were introduced to the science teachers. A descriptive multicase study design was employed to track teachers’ development over the yearlong program. Data included interviews, surveys, classroom observations, teachers’ technology integration plans, and action research study reports. The program was found to have positive impacts to varying degrees on teachers’ development of TPACK. Contextual factors and teachers’ pedagogical reasoning affected teachers’ ability to enact in their classrooms what they learned in the program. Suggestions for designing effective professional development programs to improve science teachers’ TPACK are discussed.

Citation

Guzey, S.S. & Roehrig, G.H. (2009). Teaching Science with Technology: Case Studies of Science Teachers' Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved February 23, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (2004). A model for achieving teacher development. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in science education, (pp. 258-278). New York:
  2. Cochran, K.F., DeRuiter, J.A., & King, R.A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
  3. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1993). Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teacher College Press.
  4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
  5. Crawford, B.A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create an inquiry based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 175-194.
  6. Crawford, B.A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
  7. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking about technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 342-361.
  8. Fernandez-Balvoa, J. & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching& Teacher Education, 11(3), 293-306.
  9. Glaser, B.G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
  10. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  11. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
  12. Huffman, D. (2006). Reforming pedagogy: In-service teacher education and instruction reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 121-136.
  13. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences informing technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
  14. Hughes, J., Kerr, S., & Ooms, A. (2005). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Cases of teacher learning and technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 367-379.
  15. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  16. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, (pp. 3-31). New York: Routledge.
  17. Krajcik, J., Blumenfield, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary Science Journal, 94(5), 483-498.
  18. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral. New York: Cambridge
  19. Lee, E., Brown, M., Luft, J., & Roehrig, G. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52-60.
  20. Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
  21. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P.W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  22. Magnusson, S., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. (1994). Teaching complex subject matter in science: Insights from an analysis of pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.
  23. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11.
  24. McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topic-specific challenges of TPCK in science. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content nowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 193-206). New
  25. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  26. Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N.B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459-479.
  27. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  28. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  29. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  30. Niess, M.L. (2008). Guiding preservice teachers in developing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, (pp. 223-251). New York: Routledge
  31. Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15-27.
  32. Novak, A.M., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Using technology to support inquiry in middle school science. In L.B. Flick & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education, (pp. 75-101). Netherlands:
  33. Office of Technology Assessment.(1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  34. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication
  35. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
  36. Roehrig, G., & Luft, J.A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 3-24.
  37. Roehrig, G., & Luft, J.A. (2006). Does one size fit all?: The induction experience of beginning science teachers from different teacher preparation programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 963-985.
  38. Roehrig, G., Luft, J., & Edwards, M. (2001). Versatile VeeMaps. The Science Teacher, 68(1), 28-31.
  39. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
  40. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 4-14.
  41. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Reviews, 57, 1-22.
  42. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  43. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99-110.
  44. Trowbridge, L.W., Bybee, R.W., & Powell, J.C. (2008). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  45. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  46. Zeichner, K. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P-12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301-325.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Examining Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy: Impact of Mobile Technology-Based Physics Curriculum

    Deepika Menon, Towson University, United States; Meera Chandrasekhar, Dorina Kosztin & Douglas Steinhoff, University of Missouri-Columbia, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 3 (September 2017) pp. 336–359

  2. Excellence in Elementary School Science (EESS): Teachers’ Perceptions & Technology Integration from a Professional Development

    Helen Hu & Uma Garimella, University of Central Arkansas, United States

    Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 36, No. 2 (April 2017) pp. 159–172

  3. Elementary Teachers’ Simulation Adoption and Inquiry-Based Use Following Professional Development

    Amanda Gonczi, Michigan Technological University, United States; Jennifer Maeng, University of Virginia, United States; Randy Bell, Oregon State University, United States

    Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 2017) pp. 155–184

  4. Teacher Self-Efficacy in 1:1 iPad Integration in Middle School Science and Math Classrooms

    Lana Minshew & Janice Anderson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 15, No. 3 (September 2015) pp. 334–367

  5. Exploring an Experienced Online Instructor’s Applications of TPACK in a Graduate-level Online Course Through the Online Students’ Perspectives: Design of a Qualitative Case Study

    Fan Ouyang, University of Minnesota, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 291–299

  6. Using Cloud-Computing Applications to Support Collaborative Scientific Inquiry: Examining Pre-Service Teachers' Perceived Barriers to Integration

    Joel D. Donna & Brant G. Miller

    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 39, No. 3 (Aug 15, 2013)

  7. A Case Study of a TPACK-Based Approach to Teacher Professional Development:Teaching Science With Blogs

    Kamini Jaipal-Jamani & Candace Figg, Brock University, Canada

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 15, No. 2 (June 2015) pp. 161–200

  8. Teacher Implementation of Co-Designed iPad Integrated Science Instruction

    Lana Minshew & Janice Anderson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 1685–1690

  9. Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model

    Syh-Jong Jang & Meng-Fang Tsai, Chung-Yuan Christian University

    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 29, No. 4 (Sep 22, 2013)

  10. Using cloud-computing applications to support collaborative scientific inquiry: Examining pre-service teachers’ perceived barriers towards integration / Utilisation d'applications infonuagiques pour appuyer la recherche scientifique collaborative

    Joel Donna, University of Minnesota; Brant Miller, University of Idaho

    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 39, No. 3 (Aug 15, 2013)

  11. Guiding Pre-service Teachers Toward Technology Supported Learner-Centered Instruction: Using the TPACK Literature to Inform Teacher Educator Pedagogy

    Jessica Leeman, University of Florida, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 4983–4988

  12. Integrating Educational Technology into the Secondary Science Teaching

    S. Selcen Guzey, University of Minnesota, STEM Education Center, United States; Gillian H. Roehrig, University of Minnesota, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 12, No. 2 (June 2012) pp. 162–183

  13. Does the TPACK framework help to design a more engaging learning environment?

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia; Pauline Roberts, School of Education, Murdoch University, Australia

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3498–3504

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.